Re: [OSM-legal-talk] data derived from UK Ordnace Survey

2011-06-16 Thread andrzej zaborowski
On 16 June 2011 14:47, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote: > On 16 June 2011 09:55, Richard Fairhurst wrote: >> Robert Whittaker wrote: >>> A major purpose of the CTs is to ensure that all the data >>> remaining in OSM is suitable for re-licensing under any "Free >>> and Open" license without the need

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] data derived from UK Ordnace Survey

2011-06-16 Thread David Groom
- Original Message - From: "Richard Fairhurst" To: Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:25 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] data derived from UK Ordnace Survey David Groom wrote: However your argument above completely fails to refer to Clause 2 of the CT's (and R

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] data derived from UK Ordnace Survey

2011-06-16 Thread Richard Fairhurst
David Groom wrote: > However your argument above completely fails to refer to Clause 2 > of the CT's (and Robert Whittaker wrote similarly) Yes. It's my belief that 2 onwards have to be read in the context of 1a/1b. There would be no point having 1a/1b if that were not the case; and my reading of