Hi,
On 03/06/2012 02:36 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Personally, I don't think that *verifying* their data against OSM data
(in the sense of flagging potential problems, as long as they don't copy
our data outright) would be a valid use of our data that would not
create a "derived database". (The da
On 06/03/2012 15:34, Ed Avis wrote:
Is there a way to provide what UMP want by making a Produced Work (which could
be
public domain or CC) rather than a Derived Database?
UMP only collect "road routes". With the caveat that I probably still do
not understand *exactly* the intended use, (if
h...@weait.com]
Verzonden: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 2:44 AM
Aan: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier
wrote:
On 12/20/2011 10:11 PM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
Of particular interest are
On 12/21/2011 02:43 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
>> On 12/20/2011 10:11 PM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
Of particular interest are:
- can node positions be cleaned by moving to a new position?
>>
>> While you are at it, I would love
4 matches
Mail list logo
