> > OpenStreetMap values community cohesion over data perfection.
>
> Could both terms be more elaborated on?
> Does "data perfection" in practice mean "adding true but not really
> useful things, often in not-well-thought-out way"?
> Because otherwise, we should strive to be perfect.
Ah, this i
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jo Walsh wrote:
> OpenStreetMap values community cohesion over data perfection.
Could both terms be more elaborated on?
Does "data perfection" in practice mean "adding true but not really
useful things, often in not-well-thought-out way"?
Because otherwise, we sh
Hi,
On 02/12/2015 08:53 PM, Jo Walsh wrote:
> so I can only accept a tiny modicum of credit for
> compressing it :)
... from a dry and almost legalese long-form that nobody wanted to read
into something that radiates community spirit. Credit whom credit is due ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015, at 07:39 PM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
>
> I welcome this page, I think it is very useful.
>
> One small comment - I oppose the following sentence:
Thank you for the comment Matthijs, I've added it to the discussion page
her
On 10 February 2015 at 12:19, Jo Walsh wrote:
> I wish to float this draft page for discussion and possibly future
> approval!
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
I welcome this page, I think it is very useful.
One small comment - I oppose the following sentence:
| OpenStreetMap h
Agreed with all of the above, this is a great, concise, and friendly piece. I
would love for this to be accessible not just for new signees but available for
old timers looking for a nice refresher
—
Sent from Mailbox
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Ed Loach wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2015 17:53, "
On 11 Feb 2015 17:53, "Michael Kugelmann" wrote:
>
> Am 11.02.2015 um 17:51 schrieb Mikel Maron:
>>
>> Already a great piece.
>
> +1
>
>
> As a suggestion for improvement:
> I'd love to have a clear statment in the way that somebody new in the
project should at least inform himself about practice/
Am 11.02.2015 um 17:51 schrieb Mikel Maron:
Already a great piece.
+1
As a suggestion for improvement:
I'd love to have a clear statment in the way that somebody new in the
project should at least inform himself about practice/methods and
tagging conventions used since years before inventing
Hi,
Am 2015-02-11 um 17:51 schrieb Mikel Maron:
> Already a great piece. This should go out to all new signups.
I agree, too. It is short enough to be shown at the signup page.
Best regards
Michael
--
Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt.
I prefer GPG encryption of emails.
Already a great piece. This should go out to all new signups.
> On Feb 10, 2015, at 4:19 AM, Jo Walsh wrote:
>
> dear all,
>
> I wish to float this draft page for discussion and possibly future
> approval!
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
>
> The page is a summary of a draf
dear all,
I wish to float this draft page for discussion and possibly future
approval!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
The page is a summary of a draft Mappers' Code written by Frederik some
time ago after extensive discussion with the rest of the DWG. When I
signed up to the DWG I
11 matches
Mail list logo