On 21 May 2010 00:34, Peter Batty peter.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
And perhaps also private organizations that will take your data but
not let you have it back :) ?
Sent from my iPhone
^^^
oh, the irony
___
talk mailing list
Perhaps it would be useful to maintain a (shrinking) list of Publicly
funded organizations that don't reciprocally share their data under
open data licenses? It could link to contact info and a outline of an
argument for appealing why and how the data could be opened.
On May 19, 2010, at 8:04 PM,
And perhaps also private organizations that will take your data but
not let you have it back :) ?
Sent from my iPhone
On May 20, 2010, at 5:51 AM, Andrew Turner ajtur...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps it would be useful to maintain a (shrinking) list of Publicly
funded organizations that don't
not a bad idea, sort of name-and-shame... but it could just be a wiki page
On May 19, 2010, at 6:35 PM, Andrew Turner wrote:
Perhaps it would be useful to maintain a (shrinking) list of Publicly funded
organizations that don't reciprocally share their data under open data
licenses? It could
any takers on doing that?
On May 19, 2010, at 6:35 PM, Andrew Turner wrote:
Perhaps it would be useful to maintain a (shrinking) list of Publicly funded
organizations that don't reciprocally share their data under open data
licenses? It could link to contact info and a outline of an
5 matches
Mail list logo
