On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Martijn van Exel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only exceptions apparently
> being that self-intersecting polygons are allowed in OSM. He found a
> couple hundred in the Netherlands' OSM data.
Option 1: Fix them
Option 2: Provide a list so someone else can fix
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 00:07 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> So much for OGC stuff in general. About Simple Features specifically,
> I guess there simply was nobody who wanted to do the extra work. I
> remember Artem complaining about self-intersecting stuff once and I
> think the offending items are
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:15:16AM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The only exceptions apparently
> > being that self-intersecting polygons are allowed in OSM.
>
> The wiki page you cited says "In general, a 2D geometry is simple if
> it contains no self-intersection." - what do they m
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:19:19AM +0200, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> El Miércoles, 16 de Abril de 2008, Christopher Schmidt escribió:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:28:32PM +0200, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> > > yesterday a colleague approached me asking why OSM data doesn't comply to
> > > the Si
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:58:21PM +0200, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Op 16 apr 2008, om 23:41 heeft Christopher Schmidt het volgende
> geschreven:
> >On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:28:32PM +0200, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> >It seems likely that the netherlands 'self intersecting polygons' are
> >simply
Op 17 apr 2008, om 00:07 heeft Frederik Ramm het volgende geschreven:
> Hi,
>
>> yesterday a colleague approached me asking why OSM data
>> doesn't comply to the Simple Feature specification[1]
>
> I guess the honest answer is very likely that most people invovled in
> designing anything at OSM hav
El Miércoles, 16 de Abril de 2008, Christopher Schmidt escribió:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:28:32PM +0200, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> > yesterday a colleague approached me asking why OSM data doesn't comply to
> > the Simple Feature specification[...]
> > Is this something that is being consider
Hi,
> The only exceptions apparently
> being that self-intersecting polygons are allowed in OSM.
The wiki page you cited says "In general, a 2D geometry is simple if
it contains no self-intersection." - what do they mean by "2D
geometry"? Specifically, would a self-intersecting *line* be allow
Hi,
> yesterday a colleague approached me asking why OSM data
> doesn't comply to the Simple Feature specification[1]
I guess the honest answer is very likely that most people invovled in
designing anything at OSM have no prior GIS experience. Most of us are
amateurs. We design stuff that we thin
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:28:32PM +0200, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The only exceptions apparently being that self-intersecting polygons
> are allowed in OSM. He found a couple hundred in the Netherlands' OSM
> data.
>
> Is this something that is being considered? I guess it would b
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Martijn van Exel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been warming up as many of my colleagues to OSM as possible, and
> sometimes this comes back to me. Being GIS people, they have GIS
> requirements, and OSM was not devised specifically with GIS
> requir
11 matches
Mail list logo
