Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-legal-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

2010-07-17 Thread John Smith
On 17 July 2010 22:04, John Smith wrote: > On 17 July 2010 21:57, Heiko Jacobs wrote: >> Did I misunderstood the posting below because of not perfect english? > > I was thinking about a different email, however it's the same case but > has the wrong interpretation as to the scope. > The grounds

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-legal-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

2010-07-17 Thread John Smith
On 17 July 2010 21:57, Heiko Jacobs wrote: > Did I misunderstood the posting below because of not perfect english? I was thinking about a different email, however it's the same case but has the wrong interpretation as to the scope. ___ talk mailing lis

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-legal-talk] What could we do to make this licences discussion more inclusive?

2010-07-14 Thread Emilie Laffray
On 14 July 2010 14:05, James Livingston wrote: > > I.e. can the legal advice only be shared among people actually on the > > LWG conference call, and not all OSMF members? > > Who can be on the call - LWG members, any OSMF member, or anyone involved > in the project? Actually, I can't even find h