On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 7:09 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
everything can be something you might want to navigate to, so this is
a bad definition IMHO.
The fact that categories are used as keys is a bad design. So, whatever.
2010/10/21 Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com:
The definition of such a tag/key that is so common the database (3+%
according to taginfo: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/amenity), needs
more than a single line definition.
Why? The shorter the definition, the better. The definitions should
There are two types of thing that use the amenity tag:
Small objects that are usually inside others, like water fountains and
post boxes
Larger objects that may take up entire lots, like schools and restaurants
Perhaps it would make sense to treat these differently?
A short definition is great but I think the wiki page could use a little
more explanation *after* the definition, e.g. some examples, references to
supporting sources like wikipedia. I also think that it is worth
mentioning and linking to pertinent mail archive threads on the use of the
tag as
2010/10/22 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
There are two types of thing that use the amenity tag:
Small objects that are usually inside others, like water fountains and
post boxes
Larger objects that may take up entire lots, like schools and restaurants
Perhaps it would make sense to
2010/10/22 Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com:
A short definition is great but I think the wiki page could use a little
more explanation *after* the definition, e.g. some examples, references to
supporting sources like wikipedia.
while it is convenient to link to wikipedia I don't like the
6 matches
Mail list logo
