Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] TIGER Addressing Import

2009-10-03 Thread Adam Schreiber
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: > Is this the most up to date way of keeping addresses? > >         > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema That's the scheme I use when adding addresses. There are presets for it in Potlatche, so I

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] TIGER Addressing Import

2009-10-03 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 3 Oct 2009, at 17:42, Mike N. wrote: > > It needs to follow the road way to some extent, but it might be > possible > to simplify by reducing node count so that it doesn't exactly follow > the > road. In the samples I have seen, house placement is much > different than > the road path

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] TIGER Addressing Import

2009-10-04 Thread Apollinaris Schoell
On 3 Oct 2009, at 9:13 , Dave Hansen wrote: > Is this the most up to date way of keeping addresses? > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema > yes and well supported by the renderer > Well, I have some perl code that will parse the 2007/20

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] TIGER Addressing Import

2009-10-13 Thread Apollinaris Schoell
On 13 Oct 2009, at 9:20 , SteveC wrote: > Dave - super awesome. > > As I said on IRC the other week, but I'll repeat here for all - I > think dumping the addressing for all 3,000 counties and then letting > people import them one by one will be the best way to do it. > yes this is the best way t