On 13 Oct 2009, at 9:20 , SteveC wrote:
> Dave - super awesome.
>
> As I said on IRC the other week, but I'll repeat here for all - I
> think dumping the addressing for all 3,000 counties and then letting
> people import them one by one will be the best way to do it.
>
yes this is the best way t
On 3 Oct 2009, at 9:13 , Dave Hansen wrote:
> Is this the most up to date way of keeping addresses?
>
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema
>
yes and well supported by the renderer
> Well, I have some perl code that will parse the 2007/20
On 3 Oct 2009, at 17:42, Mike N. wrote:
>
> It needs to follow the road way to some extent, but it might be
> possible
> to simplify by reducing node count so that it doesn't exactly follow
> the
> road. In the samples I have seen, house placement is much
> different than
> the road path
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Is this the most up to date way of keeping addresses?
>
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema
That's the scheme I use when adding addresses. There are presets for
it in Potlatche, so I
4 matches
Mail list logo