Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] proposed automated edit: forested wetlands

2012-05-31 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello. >>> But what would be the best tags to use? Would natural=wetland >>> wetland=swamp ("An area of waterlogged forest, with dense vegetation.") >>> be correct? > > I currently have no objection to this tag change. I have to propose a bit > more. Sorry for delay. I looked at data. If you li

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] proposed automated edit: forested wetlands

2012-05-30 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 05/30/2012 11:46 AM, Worst Fixer wrote: Before you upload, I want have a look at data. I see already there are other shitty import tags on objects with "note=Forested Wetland". We should consider fixing these too. 10 hours delay before upload will be sufficent for me. There's absolutely

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] proposed automated edit: forested wetlands

2012-05-30 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello. >> The landuse import for Georgia (which IMO is poor-quality and should be >> deleted, but that's not going to happen) has a bunch of areas tagged as >> note = Forested Wetland with no useful natural=* tags (since >> natural=wood and natural=wetland both apply). Example: >> http://www.opens