On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Simon Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 02:16:07PM +0100, Martin Norbäck wrote:
>> b) 2+1 ways as we call them in Sweden, they are normal ways but have a
>> small fence in the middle and 2 lanes on one side and 1 lane on the
>> other side. T
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 02:16:07PM +0100, Martin Norbäck wrote:
> b) 2+1 ways as we call them in Sweden, they are normal ways but have a
> small fence in the middle and 2 lanes on one side and 1 lane on the
> other side. They look like this:
> http://www.vv.se/filer/Vägprojekt/3-Falt.jpg
Having th
Martin Norbäck schrieb:
>>> The advantage of having a simple tagging mechanism like this is that
>>> the editors can easily prevent accidental reversal of a way, like josm
>>> does right now with oneway. There are probably other uses for this
>>> kind of scheme. And it doesn't really fit into a rel
>> I understand that I can map them as two roads, but physically they are
>> one road. So I'm thinking, why map them as two roads, when they are one.
>> Motorways are different, they consist of two separated pieces of way.
>> They have ramps and acceleration fields.
Deja vu. This thread is an almo
>
>>> b) 2+1 ways as we call them in Sweden, they are normal ways but have a
>>> small fence in the middle and 2 lanes on one side and 1 lane on the
>>> other side. They look like this:
>>> http://www.vv.se/filer/V?gprojekt/3-Falt.jpg
>>
>> I would say that these should be done the same way as moto
2008/11/28 Martin Norbäck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm sure this has been discussed in length before, but I cannot seem
> to find a good way to search the archives. Anyway, I will present my
> thoughts here and you can respond or be quiet :)
>
> I'm trying to fix at least two issues I
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Martin Norbäck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) A way that is sort of one-way but allows buses and taxis in the
> opposite direction.
>
> Don't know how to tag them, currently I've just ignored buses and
> taxis and tagged them oneway=yes.
>
I don' tag this but perh
for better describing of lane-situation we should use lane-relations. So
we are even able to set position to each other very simple and hi detailed
--
Mario
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Shaun McDonald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28 Nov 2008, at 13:16, Martin Norbäck wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody,
>> I'm sure this has been discussed in length before, but I cannot seem
>> to find a good way to search the archives. Anyway, I will present my
>>
Hi,
On 28 Nov 2008, at 13:16, Martin Norbäck wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm sure this has been discussed in length before, but I cannot seem
to find a good way to search the archives. Anyway, I will present my
thoughts here and you can respond or be quiet :)
I'm trying to fix at least two issues I h
Martin Norbäck wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm sure this has been discussed in length before, but I cannot seem
> to find a good way to search the archives. Anyway, I will present my
> thoughts here and you can respond or be quiet :)
>
> I'm trying to fix at least two issues I have.
>
> a) A way tha
Hi everybody,
I'm sure this has been discussed in length before, but I cannot seem
to find a good way to search the archives. Anyway, I will present my
thoughts here and you can respond or be quiet :)
I'm trying to fix at least two issues I have.
a) A way that is sort of one-way but allows buses
12 matches
Mail list logo
