Beau Gunderson wrote:
> The 'wings' at the start and end of the bridge in Osmarender don't
> really work when rendering complex freeway interchanges like this, they
> tend to clutter things up to my eye.
>
> The things that do look great in the Osmarender style are the additional
> white line b
Alex Mauer wrote:
> Beau Gunderson wrote:
>
>> What do you all think?
>>
>
> I agree with everything you said. I think that losing the "wings" would
> be a big improvement in osmarender even for more basic bridges.
>
> -Alex Mauer "hawke"
>
>
+1
Cheers, Chris
_
Beau Gunderson wrote:
>
>
> What do you all think?
I agree with everything you said. I think that losing the "wings" would
be a big improvement in osmarender even for more basic bridges.
-Alex Mauer "hawke"
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.
Here's a freeway interchange near Seattle, WA in Mapnik:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.63265&lon=-122.18557&zoom=17&layers=B00FF
And here's the same in Osmarender:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.63265&lon=-122.18557&zoom=17&layers=0B0FF
The 'wings' at the start and end of the br
4 matches
Mail list logo
