On 25.12.16 00:58, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 24 Dec 2016, at 19:57, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:
example, I would like to be able to hide in the JOSM existing already
power-lines, roads, paths, etc. in order to map farlmland, woods, grassland,
sent from a phone
> On 24 Dec 2016, at 19:57, Oleksiy Muzalyev
> wrote:
>
> example, I would like to be able to hide in the JOSM existing already
> power-lines, roads, paths, etc. in order to map farlmland, woods, grassland,
> etc. Perhaps, it is possible in
It reminds me how in 60s and 70s it was widely believed that the
computers will be doing text translation instead of human translators.
We realize now, fifty years later, that is actually a hard problem. And
it is still impossible to translate a novel or a poem by a computer
program alone.
I
One example: OpenSolarMap...
We first start by crowdsourcing building roof orientations using a very
simple webapp (no need to register, open to anybody).
When enough contribution match they are considered OK (at least 3 more than
all other contributions).
Then, these contributions were used to
Frederik, all
> an editor plugin were to help the mapper trace buildings that the mapper
>identifies or at least individually verifies, that would probably be ok
This feels like the consensus across the board -- machine learning has
potential to be useful when integrated into a human editor
and that makes a lot of sense.
Thanks John
On 21 December 2016 at 19:58, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/22/2016 01:10 AM, john whelan wrote:
> > Do we have any guidelines in the wiki etc?
>
> Nothing specific, no.
>
> Automated editing and/or import guidelines would
Hi,
On 12/22/2016 01:10 AM, john whelan wrote:
> Do we have any guidelines in the wiki etc?
Nothing specific, no.
Automated editing and/or import guidelines would apply to any such
process and I would ask everyone who overhears discussions about
"uploading" machine-detected data to OSM to point
Do we have any guidelines in the wiki etc?
I'm not intending doing any but the topic has come up once or twice and has
currently been raised in the HOT mailing list.
I'm almost certain that as the accuracy improves so the topic will come up
again and we should at least have some guidelines in
8 matches
Mail list logo