On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 01:05:51AM +0200, Marc_marc wrote:
> I have learn about this area and it seem that the Gulf of Ob is an area
> affected by tiles.
> so the coastline should follow the Gulf as before and not stop somewhere
> inside the Gulf it-self
>
> I have reverted the coastline change in
Hello,
Le 15.09.22 à 01:05, Marc_marc a écrit :
I hope this allow the export to resume this night.
unfortunately not
I guess the blocking factor now is the change around
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087702973
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1lTm
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125145
Hello,
I have learn about this area and it seem that the Gulf of Ob is an area
affected by tiles.
so the coastline should follow the Gulf as before and not stop somewhere
inside the Gulf it-self
I have reverted the coastline change in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126200089
talk wi
Hi!
the OSM extracts formerly at openstreetmapdata.com are moving to their
new home at https://osmdata.openstreetmap.de/ . If you are using the
coastlines or icesheet downloads switch to that site now!
If you are using generalized datasets, contact me. These datasets are
not available on the new
On Friday 22 November 2013, Paul Norman wrote:
>
> A particular square (400x400 mercator km, I think) containing
> coastline can be evaluated without considering the rest of the
> continent thanks to the directionality of coastline ways mattering.
> You'd periodically get squares that would end up
> From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 1:51 AM
> To: Paul Norman
> Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:24:46PM -0800, Paul Norman wrote:
> > > From: Jochen
Hi,
> I think we have to face it: The approach of allowing the user to add
> anything to the map and later fix it has failed. I strongly believed in
> it for the longest time. But I don't any more. We have to have stronger
> guarantees in the data structures and more checks in editors and in
> the
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:24:46PM -0800, Paul Norman wrote:
> > From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
> > Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:13 AM
> > To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> > Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> From: Jochen Topf [mailto:joc...@remote.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:13 AM
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
>
> Hi!
>
> For the last about two weeks we haven't gotten any coastline updates
> through. The pr
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:49:36PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > BTW it seems that the inspector doesn't show icons on errors in the
> > lowest zoomlevel (experienced with Firefox and Opera).
>
> Works for me. What you are seeing might be due to a different known bug
> with OSMI: If the 180° line
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 06:53:15PM +0100, malenki wrote:
> Jochen Topf wrote:
>
> >I have now changed the coastline update process from "once a day" to
> >"once every 4 hours". This means updates show up quicker in the OSM
> >Inspector at http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline .
>
> Some
Jochen Topf wrote:
>I have now changed the coastline update process from "once a day" to
>"once every 4 hours". This means updates show up quicker in the OSM
>Inspector at http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline .
Some mappers still break the coastlines faster than you check them. I
looke
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 06:08:40PM +0100, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> On Monday 18 November 2013, Jochen Topf wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > For the last about two weeks we haven't gotten any coastline updates
> > through. The problem is that every day there is something broken
> > somewhere with the coastl
On Monday 18 November 2013, Jochen Topf wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For the last about two weeks we haven't gotten any coastline updates
> through. The problem is that every day there is something broken
> somewhere with the coastline. Often problems get fixed the same day,
> but new problems show up the next
Hi!
For the last about two weeks we haven't gotten any coastline updates through.
The problem is that every day there is something broken somewhere with the
coastline. Often problems get fixed the same day, but new problems show up
the next.
I have now changed the coastline update process from "o
AM UTC.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Simone Cortesi [mailto:sim...@cortesi.com]
>> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 2:34 PM
>> To: Paul Norman
>> Cc: osm-talk
>> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation resumed
>>
>> Paul,
>> are you s
Whoops - looks like I had disabled the cron job. Files should start
uploading at about 2-3 AM UTC.
> -Original Message-
> From: Simone Cortesi [mailto:sim...@cortesi.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 2:34 PM
> To: Paul Norman
> Cc: osm-talk
> Subject: Re: [O
aul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 11:55 PM
>> To: 'osm-talk'
>> Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation resumed
>>
>> I have resumed my daily generation of coastline files. These are
>> generated with the coastcheck program[1]
daily, and so it won't be
an issue in a while.
David
- Original Message -
From: Paul Norman
To: 'osm-talk'
Cc: David Groom
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:42 AM
Subject: RE: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation resumed
Minor update: I am now running three
though I know when my runs finish.
> From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 11:55 PM
> To: 'osm-talk'
> Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation resumed
>
> I have resumed my daily generation of coastline files. These are
> generate
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
> There is a visualization of errors at http://www.wightpaths.co.uk/coast/
>
> Many of the errors appear to be short errors between ways that became
> disconnected. More complicated errors are often best fixed by deleting the
> bad coastline and
I have resumed my daily generation of coastline files. These are generated
with the coastcheck program[1] from my jxapi database starting at 5 AM
pacific time. They take 3-4 hours to generate and upload, depending on my
internet speed at the time.
The completed files are uploaded to
http://pnorman
On the talk-ca list there have been a few discussion about problems
with "flooded" areas in southern Quebec. The conclusion seems to be
that the problems are due to the rendering of the coastline which only
gets updated every once in a while. The two cases are:
* http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 20:41 +0100, OJ W wrote:
> Is there some problem with the coastline at Doha airport? The new
> coastline (changed since February) doesn't yet appear in rendered
> maps, but looks reasonable in the Edit view:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=25.24915&lon=51.61024&zoom=15&la
Is there some problem with the coastline at Doha airport? The new
coastline (changed since February) doesn't yet appear in rendered
maps, but looks reasonable in the Edit view:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=25.24915&lon=51.61024&zoom=15&layers=M
___
locations
> -Original Message-
> From: ThomasB [mailto:toba0...@yahoo.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 7:01 AM
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> do you plan another update?
>
> Regards
> Thomas
>
Hi Paul,
do you plan another update?
Regards
Thomas
Paul Norman wrote
>
> I have completed another coastline generation and it has uploaded. This
> version respects odbl=clean.
>
> The shapefiles are in their normal place at
> http://pnorman.dev.openstreetmap.org/coastlines/
>
> Included is
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Bennett"
To: "Paul Norman"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 12:58 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
There are no significant multi-square flooded or dry areas. The
On 1-4-2012 3:40, Paul Norman wrote:
Just be careful to not accidentally upload the .osm that indicate the
problems.
You should modify it to have upload='false' in there. Then JOSM will
discourage you from uploading that file.
See http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/4043
--
Lennard
_
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Errington [mailto:a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk]
> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 6:01 PM
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
>
> On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:31:53 Clifford Snow wrote:
> > On F
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:31:53 Clifford Snow wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
> > I have completed another coastline generation and it has uploaded. This
> > version respects odbl=clean.
> >
> > The shapefiles are in their normal place at
> > http://pnorman.dev.openstreet
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
> I have completed another coastline generation and it has uploaded. This
> version respects odbl=clean.
>
> The shapefiles are in their normal place at
> http://pnorman.dev.openstreetmap.org/coastlines/
>
> Included is a .osm file with all the
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
> There are no significant multi-square flooded or dry areas. The following
> areas have significant number of error points:
>
> Pudget Sound in Washington State
> The mouth of the Columbia river in Washington
> The Eastern Australia coast
Speak
> > Toby wrote:
> >
> >> Assuming you used the data I supplied this morning, it is actually
> >> from 12:30 AM CST last night when I started the jxapi query before
> >> going to bed.
> >>
> >> Also, it looks like http://www.wightpaths.co.uk/coast/CT-only.php
> >> has
> >> been updated with your ne
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Loach"
To: "'Toby Murray'" ;
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
Toby wrote:
Assuming you used the data I supplied this morning, it is actually
from 12:30 AM CST last
Toby wrote:
> Assuming you used the data I supplied this morning, it is actually
> from 12:30 AM CST last night when I started the jxapi query before
> going to bed.
>
> Also, it looks like http://www.wightpaths.co.uk/coast/CT-only.php
> has
> been updated with your new files since you sent your
Paul
A big thank you for providing all of the data.
It has helped to greatly reduce the number of error points over the last
week.
Regards
David
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Norman"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 4:26 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
Paul Norman wrote
>
>
> http://suncobalt.homeip.net:82/coastline.php are two visualizations of
> errors but neither has yet updated to the new data.
>
>
It updated now. Thanks for providing the data.
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Coastline-Update-t
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
>
> The data is from 7 AM PST and the ODbL status is slightly more recent.
Assuming you used the data I supplied this morning, it is actually
from 12:30 AM CST last night when I started the jxapi query before
going to bed.
Also, it looks like
I have completed another coastline generation and it has uploaded. This
version respects odbl=clean.
The shapefiles are in their normal place at
http://pnorman.dev.openstreetmap.org/coastlines/
Included is a .osm file with all the error points.
An overview can be found at http://maps.paulnorman.
http://metro.teczno.com/#coastline - someone?
On Jan 10, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Thomas Davie wrote:
> Is there any way we can get a coastline rerender some time soon? It's been
> broken (but fixed in the data) around inverness for nearly a month now.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom Davie
>
Is there any way we can get a coastline rerender some time soon? It's been
broken (but fixed in the data) around inverness for nearly a month now.
Thanks
Tom Davie
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/ta
- Original Message -
From: "Simone Cortesi"
To: "Michal Migurski"
Cc: "Talk Openstreetmap"
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Argh, Canvec imports
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:40, Michal Migurski wrote:
A cry of frustration:
I do bimonthly runs of the
On Oct 9, 2011, at 7:06 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
>> I've been slowly adding cities, but I'm being somewhat U.S.-centric in
>> my choices. If you have something you'd like to see in the list don't
>> hesitate to contact me. It's just a simple matter of appending a line of
>> text to a file! (and wait
> From: Michal Migurski [mailto:m...@stamen.com]
> Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline extracts now added to metropolitan area
> extracts
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've updated my metro extracts with some new cities and individual
> extracts of the coastline shapefile
Hi everyone,
I've updated my metro extracts with some new cities and individual extracts of
the coastline shapefiles for each area:
http://metro.teczno.com/
I've been slowly adding cities, but I'm being somewhat U.S.-centric in my
choices. If you have something you'd like to see in the
Dear experts,
I rendered some area by mapnik from France and Germany derived from
Europe.osm.bz2.
But some part of them are blue. is it some problem with small coast line in
this case? or no, that is because of some thing else?
please see the attachment.
Thank you in advance,
Saphy
<>_
On 14/06/11 12:07, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
> OK i just say this, thanks.
> I seems that the river bank removal has been updated (in mapnik render)
> but not the new coastline... Just wait ;-)
The coastline data will be updated in a few weeks, but the mapnik layer
won't notice this. It will on
Ed Loach wrote:
>
> > Can someone help me to fix this.
>
> Yes. Just wait. Mapnik coastlines are updated at long intervals
> (wiki says every few weeks). Looks OK to me on the Osmarender layer.
OK i just say this, thanks.
I seems that the river bank removal has been updated (in mapnik render)
Pierre asked:
> Can someone help me to fix this.
Yes. Just wait. Mapnik coastlines are updated at long intervals
(wiki says every few weeks). Looks OK to me on the Osmarender layer.
Ed
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstr
I made a modification in my country coastline (France).
I added a coastline for the "Estuaire de la Gironde" (estuary) that was
previously build on river banks (but it was incorrect, it was not a
river).
So i split the riverbank and made it natural=coastline.
But since (2 days) the rendering is ba
On 25-2-2011 22:02, Jochen Topf wrote:
We have a server that has planet file kept current each day for Taginfo.
Maybe it can do the coastline check, too. It only has PBF files, though
which the coastline checker doesn't understand. But we could work around
that or change it. Storage should also
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:24:19PM +0100, Lennard wrote:
> >Can we get this going again? What exactly is needed?
>
> A server with sufficient storage and bandwidth to process a weekly
> planet, daily diffs, and many hours of single task processing per
> coastline run.
We have a server that has pl
On 25-2-2011 17:03, Jochen Topf wrote:
The coastline error checker says:
Last update of coastline errors: Wed Apr 14 13:19:17 UTC 2010
It also says it needs new hosting. I guess thats the problem.
The osm.org tile server generates its own coastline shapefiles. It
doesn't use the ones from the
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 20:01 +0100, Jochen Topf wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Falmouth:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.15364&lon=-5.0639&zoom=17&layers=M
> Looks ok now in this zoom level. Still some errors if you zoom in.
>
> I had a look at it again and marked some tile manually as dirty and I
> get
ot to be the coastline stuff
but that there are tiles that haven't been re-rendered for half a year!?
Jochen
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 05:39:46PM -, David Groom wrote:
> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:39:46 -
> From: David Groom
> To: OSM Talk
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline upda
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:35:41 -, David Groom wrote:
> David
>
> the way you refer to was last edited on 1 Feb 2011, [..]
You probably haven't read my whole message :)
The last changes are just added nodes, there is no change in the shape of the
coastline. The last changes in shape happened in
- Original Message -
From: "David Paleino"
To:
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
David
the way you refer to was last edited on 1 Feb 2011, I would not necessarily
expect to see the results of those changes reflected
Is there any reason to still have the NPE layer accessible from the editors.
It was useful in the pre-OS/Bing days but seems like a liability now?
Kevin
On 25 February 2011 17:47, Ed Loach wrote:
> > > I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are
> still
> > not
> > > updated
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:39:46 -, David Groom wrote:
> > I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
> > updated on the main map. (Easy to see because the border and coastline
> > share the same location in the data but show up differently on the map.)
>
> Can you ga
> > I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are
still
> not
> > updated on the main map. (Easy to see because the border and
> coastline
> > share the same location in the data but show up differently on
the
> map.)
> >
>
> Can you gave an example location?
I had a quick look ar
- Original Message -
From: "Jochen Topf"
To: "OSM Talk"
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 4:03 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy to see be
- Original Message -
From: "Jochen Topf"
To: "OSM Talk"
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 4:03 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy to see be
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy to see because the border and coastline
share the same location in the data but show up differently on the map.)
The coastline error checker says:
Last update of coastline errors: Wed Apr 14
On Nov 9, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Lennard wrote:
>> A stupid but working workaround is to go through the .osm file with sed or
>> something and rename coastline to something else before running osm2pgsql.
>
> And the more logical solution would be to find the single line in the
> osm2pgsql code that d
> A stupid but working workaround is to go through the .osm file with sed or
> something and rename coastline to something else before running osm2pgsql.
And the more logical solution would be to find the single line in the
osm2pgsql code that drops natural=coastline, adapt that, and
recompile/rei
Michal Migurski stamen.com> writes:
>
> Can I ask if it would be possible to include in those shapefiles a processed
coastline that's just the
> outlines, rather than the tiled land area polygon? osm2pgsql doesn't import
natural=coastline (a
> hardcoded exception) and sometimes it's useful to p
On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Jon Burgess wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 23:29 -0800, Michal Migurski wrote:
>>> I think we went back to some older shapefiles after reports of a
>>> significant problem with one of more recent updates. I just updated
>> the
>>> files with coastlines generated from th
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 23:29 -0800, Michal Migurski wrote:
> > I think we went back to some older shapefiles after reports of a
> > significant problem with one of more recent updates. I just updated
> the
> > files with coastlines generated from the planet file this week.
>
>
> Thank you Jon!
>
On Nov 7, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Jon Burgess wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 01:05 +0100, Vladimir Vyskocil wrote:
>> I checked the shoreline last modification date with : wget --server-response
>> --spider http://tile.openstreetmap.org/shoreline_300.tar.bz2
>> and the answer show :
>>
>> Last-Modifie
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 01:05 +0100, Vladimir Vyskocil wrote:
> I checked the shoreline last modification date with : wget --server-response
> --spider http://tile.openstreetmap.org/shoreline_300.tar.bz2
> and the answer show :
>
> Last-Modified: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:44:09 GMT
>
> It's about 1 mo
I checked the shoreline last modification date with : wget --server-response
--spider http://tile.openstreetmap.org/shoreline_300.tar.bz2
and the answer show :
Last-Modified: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:44:09 GMT
It's about 1 month and half ago !! Is this process broken ?
Vlad.
On 5 nov. 2010, at 19
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Ulf Mehlig wrote:
> I'm waiting for my last week's coastline changes to become visible on
> the main site's mapnik layer:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-0.7596&lon=-47.049&zoom=12&layers=M
>
> I tried to avoid caching problems, and I triggered re-rendering o
I'm waiting for my last week's coastline changes to become visible on
the main site's mapnik layer:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-0.7596&lon=-47.049&zoom=12&layers=M
I tried to avoid caching problems, and I triggered re-rendering of the
affected tiles by tagging them as dirty ... Osmarender
Short answer yes, I'm taking responsibility! I've put in a temporary join on
on the US side so it's a complete object while I fix up the Canadian side. At
the rate I'm going I should be tomorrow.
As for same level of accuracy... that's why I'm deleting it. ;) The
coastline data is curre
coastline during your
editing session. After all, there are likely to be some people who want to
render the coastline, and they won't be able to do so if you have deleted the
data.
---Original Email---
Subject :[OSM-talk] Coastline missing in Lake Superior - in case
anyonenotices...
I'm currently working on importing CanVec data around Lake Superior...
the coast line was really getting in the way, so I'm deleting it. I'm
actually joining them to the CanVec water corners... but it's probably
creating a coastal hole, not really sure if the join is actually working.
My plan
On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 20:30 +0100, Chris Hill wrote:
> Carsten Gerlach wrote:
> > Am Samstag 05. Juni 2010 11:15:16 schrieb Jon Burgess:
> >
> >> Can you provide a map link to the exact area you modified?
> >>
> >
> > Some weeks ago I fixed this coastline
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?
Carsten Gerlach wrote:
> Am Samstag 05. Juni 2010 11:15:16 schrieb Jon Burgess:
>
>> Can you provide a map link to the exact area you modified?
>>
>
> Some weeks ago I fixed this coastline
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?way=12193534 but is only in zoom level 14 right
> rendered, all othe
Am Samstag 05. Juni 2010 11:15:16 schrieb Jon Burgess:
> Can you provide a map link to the exact area you modified?
Some weeks ago I fixed this coastline
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?way=12193534 but is only in zoom level 14 right
rendered, all other levels show the old version...
Greetings, C
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 14:42 -0300, Ulf Mehlig wrote:
> I've the impression that the coastline error checker is not working at
> the moment (last updated: 14th of April); coastline changes I've made
> some weeks ago in northern Brazil have not yet been applied to the
> openstreetmap.org mapnik layer
I've the impression that the coastline error checker is not working at
the moment (last updated: 14th of April); coastline changes I've made
some weeks ago in northern Brazil have not yet been applied to the
openstreetmap.org mapnik layer. Is there anything one can do?
Thanks, Ulf
--
Ulf Mehlig
On 7 March 2010 13:55, Erik Johansson wrote:
> Whoa, had a bad day? When things doesn't doesn't work like you want
> them to, it's not because the world is a horrible mess.
no, not a bad day. previous bad experiences on osm around tagging:
everyone's so concentrated on their own small problem, th
On 6 March 2010 16:01, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
>> landuse? no, i didn't use that. i used leisure=park
>
> sure. ahh… our messy key,tag combinations for areas natural, landuse,
> leisure …
>
>>
>> and it's not a national park, only local council
>>
>
> we still use it for parks if it's the typ
2010/3/6 osm easingwold :
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-36.90445&lon=174.85045&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
> The renderer is confused by having a park overlapping the sea and it's
> obviously getting the ordering wrong.
Yes. And therefore the problem lies in the rendering rules, not the
underl
Robin Paulson wrote:
i'm after some advice. i know this is potentially tagging for the
renderer, but still
i've recently mapped a park which contains a basin. when the tiles
render, the whole area, including the water, renders green. how would
i tag this so the renderer understands the water
On 5 Mar 2010, at 13:41 , Robin Paulson wrote:
>
> landuse? no, i didn't use that. i used leisure=park
sure. ahh… our messy key,tag combinations for areas natural, landuse, leisure
…
>
> and it's not a national park, only local council
>
we still use it for parks if it's the type of parks
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Robin Paulson wrote:
> On 6 March 2010 06:23, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
>> Osmarender: add layer=-1 to the park
>> Mapnik: add a water polygon and this will render on top of all other area
>> features.
> ugh, that's horrible.
I want to know how to get this right
On 6 March 2010 06:23, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
> Didn't see when zoomed in to your view. clear now from low zoom.
> you can hack it but that is dirty tagging for the renderer.
it is indeed. i'll leave it as is, and come up with some bullshit for
when a casual map user asks why panmure basin is
On 6 March 2010 01:41, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> haven't you stated above that the water is part of the park? The
> multipolygon-relation will exclude the inner from the outer, so IMHO
> this is not your desired solution...
ah, yes. good point.
i hadn't understood it fully, thanks for pointin
On 5 Mar 2010, at 24:29 , Robin Paulson wrote:
> On 5 March 2010 20:40, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
>> Don't use coastline but tag the basin with natural water or any other water
>> type tags
>> like riverbank …
>
> hmm, well if we can ignore for a moment the abomination of
> inconsistency that
John F. Eldredge wrote:
> On a related issue, since a way that forms a closed loop is interpreted as
> the boundary of an area rather than as a way, how does one map a road or
> trail that forms a closed loop?
>
>
It depends on the context. A closed loop tagged with a highway tag is
just a c
mailing list
Subject: [OSM-talk] coastline within a park
Sent: Mar 5, 2010 1:17 AM
i'm after some advice. i know this is potentially tagging for the
renderer, but still
i've recently mapped a park which contains a basin. when the tiles
render, the whole area, including the water, renders
"Hillsman, Edward" writes:
> I have a related question, which I've let sit for several months
> hoping to find an answer for. There is a park here
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=27.8394&lon=-82.5924&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF
>
> that includes wetland islands, wetland mainland, and dry
> main
r work on the local coastline until I figure
this out.
Ed Hillsman
>Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 13:41:57 +0100
>From: Martin Koppenhoefer
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] coastline within a park
>To: Robin Paulson
>Cc: OSM Talk
>Message-ID:
> <7acdb3651003050441y1a38e833nffead2
2010/3/5 Robin Paulson :
> they'd already rendered, but now someone else has drawn it
> incorrectly. i'll revert, use a polygon relation, and re-render
haven't you stated above that the water is part of the park? The
multipolygon-relation will exclude the inner from the outer, so IMHO
this is not
On 5 March 2010 20:39, John Smith wrote:
> On 5 March 2010 17:17, Robin Paulson wrote:
>> i've recently mapped a park which contains a basin. when the tiles
>> render, the whole area, including the water, renders green. how would
>> i tag this so the renderer understands the water bit should be t
On 5 March 2010 20:40, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
> Don't use coastline but tag the basin with natural water or any other water
> type tags
> like riverbank …
hmm, well if we can ignore for a moment the abomination of
inconsistency that is water tagging in general and natural=water
specifically,
On 5 March 2010 20:35, simon wrote:
> In this case your park have to follow the coastline with the tham node
> (I have correct it to show you)
unfortunately the water is part of the park
> If it was a park with water in the midle you have to use multipolygone
> relation http://wiki.openstreetma
Don't use coastline but tag the basin with natural water or any other water
type tags like riverbank …
coastline is also sensitive to direction while water has to be a closed polygon
only, direction doesn't matter
On 4 Mar 2010, at 23:17 , Robin Paulson wrote:
> i'm after some advice. i know t
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
