Re: [OSM-talk] Cycle map: trunk-roads in mountains

2009/3/29 Dave Stubbs : > Here's the solution: get the local authority to add a cycle lane, tag > the road as having a cycle lane. Then the road will be blindingly > obvious. The roads in that area tend to have an "all-purpose additional lane" on both sides, comprising a gravel surface (with about

Re: [OSM-talk] Cycle map: trunk-roads in mountains

2009/3/29 Iván Sánchez Ortega : > El Domingo, 29 de Marzo de 2009, Dave Stubbs escribió: >> 2009/3/29 OJ W : >> > Can you spot it? >> > >> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.4122&lon=-7.3859&zoom=12&layers=00B0 >> >FTF >> >> That's what you get for not building epic bridges, tunnels, and other

Re: [OSM-talk] Cycle map: trunk-roads in mountains

El Domingo, 29 de Marzo de 2009, Dave Stubbs escribió: > 2009/3/29 OJ W : > > Can you spot it? > > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.4122&lon=-7.3859&zoom=12&layers=00B0 > >FTF > > That's what you get for not building epic bridges, tunnels, and other > contour defying structures :-P No, tha

Re: [OSM-talk] Cycle map: trunk-roads in mountains

2009/3/29 OJ W : > Can you spot it? > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.4122&lon=-7.3859&zoom=12&layers=00B0FTF LOL, not at all - it needs more than a slight colour adjustment... -- Łukasz [DeeJay1] Jernaś ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap

Re: [OSM-talk] Cycle map: trunk-roads in mountains

2009/3/29 OJ W : > Can you spot it? > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.4122&lon=-7.3859&zoom=12&layers=00B0FTF > That's what you get for not building epic bridges, tunnels, and other contour defying structures :-P Dave ___ talk mailing list talk

[OSM-talk] Cycle map: trunk-roads in mountains

Can you spot it? http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.4122&lon=-7.3859&zoom=12&layers=00B0FTF ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk