Re: [OSM-talk] Distance to opacity (OT)

2009-09-24 Thread Laurence Penney
On 24 Sep 2009, at 22:35, Ian Dees wrote: > Their streetview cars also use LIDAR to get a depthmap as they drive. They're surely not transmitting LIDAR 3D data to the Street View Flash viewer. I wonder what the minimum would be for this effect. I doubt that "steps" (a return to a horizontal pa

Re: [OSM-talk] Distance to opacity (OT)

2009-09-24 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Ian Dees wrote: >Sent: 24 September 2009 9:35 PM >To: Laurence Penney >Cc: Talk OSM >Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Distance to opacity (OT) > > > >On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Laurence Penney wrote: > > > Was "Re: [OSM-talk] Should Bridges be independent

Re: [OSM-talk] Distance to opacity (OT)

2009-09-24 Thread Ian Dees
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Laurence Penney wrote: > Was "Re: [OSM-talk] Should Bridges be independent of their ways?" > >> Well, let's take this intersection: > >> > http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&ie=UTF8&layer=c&cbll=-26.124795,152.574151&panoid=H08s6qv1gLXcd8hGtNhvwg&cbp=12,333.55,,0,2.6

[OSM-talk] Distance to opacity (OT)

2009-09-24 Thread Laurence Penney
Was "Re: [OSM-talk] Should Bridges be independent of their ways?" >> Well, let's take this intersection: >> http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&ie=UTF8&layer=c&cbll=-26.124795,152.574151&panoid=H08s6qv1gLXcd8hGtNhvwg&cbp=12,333.55,,0,2.6&ll=-26.124704,152.574123&spn=0,359.996175&z=18 OT... ... but I