Re: [OSM-talk] Dry-weather roads

2008-04-02 Thread OJ W
ele=4m? ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Dry-weather roads

2008-04-02 Thread Alex Mauer
Jo wrote: > Steve Hill schreef: >> On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: >> >>> "water=tidal" and "water=seasonal", then?? >> Sounds good to me, possibly with an optional qualifier tag such as: >> >> water:tidal:height=4(flooded by tides > 4m above datum) >> water:seasonal:dates=09/01-

Re: [OSM-talk] Dry-weather roads

2008-04-02 Thread Jo
Steve Hill schreef: > On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: > >> "water=tidal" and "water=seasonal", then?? > > Sounds good to me, possibly with an optional qualifier tag such as: > > water:tidal:height=4(flooded by tides > 4m above datum) > water:seasonal:dates=09/01-03/31(flooded

Re: [OSM-talk] Dry-weather roads

2008-04-02 Thread Nick Dyer
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I'm not entirely convinced about water=intermittent for tidal stuff though >since tides are quite predictable so there could be much more useful >information about when the water is present (e.g. "under water when tide >is >

Re: [OSM-talk] Dry-weather roads

2008-04-02 Thread Steve Hill
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: "water=tidal" and "water=seasonal", then?? Sounds good to me, possibly with an optional qualifier tag such as: water:tidal:height=4(flooded by tides > 4m above datum) water:seasonal:dates=09/01-03/31(flooded September 1 - March 31)

Re: [OSM-talk] Dry-weather roads

2008-04-02 Thread Steve Hill
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: I think some variation on the access tag make more sense, if only 'access=dry_season'. Good idea. Afterall the road/route is always there (ie. not intermittent), it is just not passable with normal vechiles. The *water* on the road *is* interm

Re: [OSM-talk] Dry-weather roads

2008-04-01 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El Miércoles, 2 de Abril de 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > > I'm thinking about using "highway=track; water=intermittent" for this > > kind of > > roads, given the fact that "water=intermittent" is proposed for > > intermittent > > lakes and rivers, given tides or weather. > > I think some var

Re: [OSM-talk] Dry-weather roads

2008-04-01 Thread simon
> > I'm thinking about using "highway=track; water=intermittent" for this kind > of > roads, given the fact that "water=intermittent" is proposed for > intermittent > lakes and rivers, given tides or weather. I think some variation on the access tag make more sense, if only 'access=dry_season'. Af

[OSM-talk] Dry-weather roads

2008-04-01 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
Hi all, I'm going to tag quite some roads in south africa. In a latitude where the wet season makes 40% of the road network non-drivable. I'm thinking about using "highway=track; water=intermittent" for this kind of roads, given the fact that "water=intermittent" is proposed for intermittent