Re: [OSM-talk] Ensuring Cyclewyays/Footways are routable?

2009-07-02 Thread Tobias Knerr
Both foot and cycle routes take a long way around (car goes even further thought an 'access=bus' section). access=bus? That tag doesn't match the usual vehicletype=usageright structure, so why would you expect it to be recognized? Tobias Knerr ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Ensuring Cyclewyays/Footways are routable?

2009-07-02 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 2 Jul 2009, at 00:54, si...@mungewell.org wrote: I had a little play with Cloudmade's routing stuff and it wasn't quite working for me.

Re: [OSM-talk] Ensuring Cyclewyays/Footways are routable?

2009-07-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/7/2 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de: Both foot and cycle routes take a long way around (car goes even further thought an 'access=bus' section). access=bus? That tag doesn't match the usual vehicletype=usageright structure, so why would you expect it to be recognized? you could take

[OSM-talk] Ensuring Cyclewyays/Footways are routable?

2009-07-01 Thread simon
I had a little play with Cloudmade's routing stuff and it wasn't quite working for me. http://maps.cloudmade.com/?lat=51.103306lng=-114.079413zoom=15directions=51.10050375773113,-114.0750789642334,51.10594712658125,-114.08280372619629travel=footstyleId=3697 Both foot and cycle routes take a