Re: [OSM-talk] Extend natural=shingle tag also for city stone areas.

2018-08-31 Thread Warin
On 01/09/18 04:12, Tomasz Wójcik wrote: As we map different physical landcovers by eg. landuse=grass, landuse=forest No. landuse=forest is for managed areas .. not for a general tree area. use natural=wood (for the render). I place additional tags with these land cover features landuse=grass

Re: [OSM-talk] Extend natural=shingle tag also for city stone areas.

2018-08-31 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 31. Aug 2018, at 21:09, Christoph Hormann wrote: > > example: If this is a walkable area (likely since it is easily > accessible and there are no signs forbidding it apparently) it would > probably be highway=pedestrian + surface=gravel/pebbles. +1 (and area=yes

Re: [OSM-talk] Extend natural=shingle tag also for city stone areas.

2018-08-31 Thread Christoph Hormann
(Note: since this is a tagging question this is in a way the wrong group). On Friday 31 August 2018, Tomasz Wc3b3jcik wrote: > As we map different physical landcovers by eg. landuse=grass, > landuse=forest, natural=sand, natural=water etc. There is > theoretically no tag for urban areas

[OSM-talk] Extend natural=shingle tag also for city stone areas.

2018-08-31 Thread Tomasz Wójcik
As we map different physical landcovers by eg. landuse=grass, landuse=forest, natural=sand, natural=water etc. There is theoretically no tag for urban areas covered by little stones like on this photo: