Simon + lost mappers task force:
Thank you so much for this important work.
(and for being patient when I came in late and asked all those questions ;)
On Aug 2, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
As some may remember from mid-February 2012 to essentially up to the
redaction bot started
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
From an original 1014 contributors in the first group a total of 495
agreed, resulting in a nearly 50% success rate. Of the 2nd group of 959,
362 agreed, giving a success rate of 38%. There was naturally some
acceptances in both
Non rigorous answer: less than a dozen I believe.
You naturally have to differentiate between genuine non-responders
which didn't respond because they didn't know (spam filter, invalid
e-mail address, e-mail account no longer in use and so on) and
decliners that didn't accept the CTs for
As some may remember from mid-February 2012 to essentially up to the
redaction bot started running, the LWG undertook to get in contact with
largest remaining non-responders that hadn't accepted the new
contributor terms.
We worked through two lists of roughly 1000 contributors each. The first
4 matches
Mail list logo
