Re: [OSM-talk] Footpaths (was: Re: Ordnance Survey tries to reinforce its stranglehold over "derived" geographic data in the UK)

Hi, Shaun McDonald wrote: > i'm miss read Tell us more? Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Footpaths (was: Re: Ordnance Survey tries to reinforce its stranglehold over "derived" geographic data in the UK)

On 20 Nov 2008, at 21:52, Alex Mauer wrote: > Shaun McDonald wrote: >> Who stopped rendering highway=footway, and when > > footway is not the same as footpath. I don't think anyone has stopped > rendering highway=footway. > Gah, i'm miss read OJW's mail. really shouldn't try to read and r

Re: [OSM-talk] Footpaths (was: Re: Ordnance Survey tries to reinforce its stranglehold over "derived" geographic data in the UK)

Shaun McDonald wrote: > Who stopped rendering highway=footway, and when footway is not the same as footpath. I don't think anyone has stopped rendering highway=footway. -Alex Mauer "hawke" signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Footpaths (was: Re: Ordnance Survey tries to reinforce its stranglehold over "derived" geographic data in the UK)

Who stopped rendering highway=footway, and when highway=path in my view is a muddy route over grass or through a forest, and is more difficult to walk on than a footway. Shaun On 20 Nov 2008, at 21:28, OJ W wrote: > however, the much easier highway=footpath is now deprecated and > unrende

[OSM-talk] Footpaths (was: Re: Ordnance Survey tries to reinforce its stranglehold over "derived" geographic data in the UK)

however, the much easier highway=footpath is now deprecated and unrendered, meaning that lots of well-researched rights-of-way are now either forgotten in OSM, or converted to 'footway' with loss of their RoW information. On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Nick Whitelegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: