On 24 August 2010 15:58, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
wrote:
> This would require the OSM database to include a extra field for each and
> every item indicating the license
You could just add the license information as part of the changeset
tags, that way there is no changes to O
Well. Then I come along, add an amenity=cafe, under a CCBYSA2.0-license. But
at the wrong spot. And you, having chosen an OdBL-license, decides to move it
to the correct position. Under what license is that node?
This isn't going to be easy, hardly possible? :)
- Vegard
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 0
Only a question:
Node A_1 is created as CC-BY-SA. Node A_2 (same as A_1) is created as ODbL.
What a mess whould happen? When I'm editing, I'm editing A_1? Or maybe A_2?
Or if:
Node A_1 exists under CC-BY-SA. Node A_2 (same as A_1) is created under PD.
The CC map will have both nodes.
Am I wrong o
A fork as stipulated is not necessarily about a group of people leaving OSM ,
but about
we (OSM) deciding to continue in two or more future directions
covered by different licenses, and maybe finally decide which license fits
best.
This would require the OSM database to include a extra fi
4 matches
Mail list logo
