On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Liz wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> > 1. What do we want to protect?
>
The data is fully open, but some people want to reduce their fingerprint on
the data to protect themselves, for example they submit their GPX tracks
privately so it will
2009/12/27 Aun Johnsen :
> Taiwan, Sri Lanka, Morocco, Israel, Palestine, Russia, all of these are
Then there is China and Iran and various other countries that love to
jail their dissidents...
As I said before, until any of this has a direct negative effect on
people personally they don't see wh
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Aun Johnsen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Liz wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> > 1. What do we want to protect?
>
> The data is fully open, but some people want to reduce their fingerprint on
> the data to protect themselves,
2009/12/28 Matt Amos :
> if you are really very concerned with your privacy: don't upload
> tracks which include your home or office locations at all.
Lets assume for a second that they are smart enough to filter their
points so they aren't near their home location, we can also assume
they may not
2009/12/28 John Smith :
> 2009/12/28 Matt Amos :
>> if you are really very concerned with your privacy: don't upload
>> tracks which include your home or office locations at all.
>
> Lets assume for a second that they are smart enough to filter their
> points so they aren't near their home location
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
> Lets assume for a second that they are smart enough to filter their
> points so they aren't near their home location, we can also assume
> they may not have vectorised the data, however there is a lot of
> non-home/non-work information still not being protected by a simple
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Matt Amos wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Aun Johnsen
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Liz wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> >> > 1. What do we want to protect?
> >
> > The data is fully open, but some people wa
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Aun Johnsen wrote:
>
>>John Smith wrote:
>> > Lets assume for a second that they are smart enough to filter their
>> > points so they aren't near their home location, we can also assume
>> > they may not have vectoris
2009/12/28 Aun Johnsen :
> John Smith, you can put your money where your mouth is and write a patch,
> since you brought this up?
I can't do anything until I know what will be protected by SSL,
because TomH said they don't even know yet.
Until something certain is stated by someone with the abili
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Smith
Date: 2009/12/23
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Why doesn't OSM implement a simple measure to
protect it's users and passwords?
To: Frederik Ramm
2009/12/23 Frederik Ramm :
> Why should we?
I gave several good reasons, but you chose to rebuff m
10 matches
Mail list logo
