Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Automated edits code of conduct

On 7/11/2016 11:45 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone Il giorno 11 lug 2016, alle ore 14:01, Éric Gillet ha scritto: I agree that survey are that on-premise survey is the best review method. But then you are adressing armchair mapping as a whole

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Automated edits code of conduct

>yes, armchair mapping generally bears the risk of misinterpreting the actual situation, (depending on what kind of tags you use this can be more or less important). Doing it in search and replace fashion is slightly different though, as you risk falsifying information someone else has

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Automated edits code of conduct

sent from a phone > Il giorno 11 lug 2016, alle ore 14:01, Éric Gillet > ha scritto: > > I agree that survey are that on-premise survey is the best review method. But > then you are adressing armchair mapping as a whole and not specifically > search-and-replace

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Automated edits code of conduct

2016-07-11 2:16 GMT+02:00 Frederik Ramm : > On 07/11/2016 02:02 AM, Éric Gillet wrote: > > If you do a search-and-replace on 20 elements and review manually the > > change, it is covered under the AE CoC. > > No, the document clearly states in the "Scope" section: > > "use of

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Automated edits code of conduct

2016-07-11 11:28 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > 2016-07-11 2:02 GMT+02:00 Éric Gillet : > >> If you do a search-and-replace on 20 elements and review manually the >> change, it is covered under the AE CoC. I don't think of that as an >>

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Automated edits code of conduct

2016-07-11 2:02 GMT+02:00 Éric Gillet : > If you do a search-and-replace on 20 elements and review manually the > change, it is covered under the AE CoC. I don't think of that as an > advanced or uncommon task. when you do any "search and replace" based edits I

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Automated edits code of conduct

Hi, On 07/11/2016 02:02 AM, Éric Gillet wrote: > If you do a search-and-replace on 20 elements and review manually the > change, it is covered under the AE CoC. No, the document clearly states in the "Scope" section: "use of find-and-replace functionality using a standard editor such as JOSM or

[OSM-talk] Fwd: Automated edits code of conduct

2016-07-10 23:56 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann : > On Sunday 10 July 2016, Éric Gillet wrote: > > > > In contrary to the Contributor Terms, these rules : > > > >- Are not shown to new contributors > >- Are not accepted by new or existing contributors > > Maybe that is