On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:15:15 +0200
Simon Poole wrote:
> the resp. IP rights without problems. In other words: you would need
> to provide downstream attribution for CC-by v3 material included in
> OSM.
I am pretty sure that it makes using this material impossible and such
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Blake Girardot wrote:
> The Mexican government signed a separate letter allowing OSMF use of
> any data for OSM mapping and make it available under ODbL 1.0 they
> release related to this event. And signed it before the hurricane made
>
Hi,
I think Simon was talking about a slightly different issue than HOT's
use of open data from the Mexican government as part of HOT's
activities related to this disaster.
The Mexican government signed a separate letter allowing OSMF use of
any data for OSM mapping and make it available under
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just to clarify further:
On top of having a signed letter, the Mexican Administration has been
releasing their open data with their own license, the Libre Uso MX
license [1], not CC-by. Data has been already imported into OSM with
that license alone,
Am 25.10.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Blake Girardot:
> ..
> I think Simon was talking about a slightly different issue than HOT's
> use of open data from the Mexican government as part of HOT's
> activities related to this disaster.
Yes correct, CC-by compatibility is always a hot topic and I didn't
Just nipping this in the bud: the statement from Sarah Hinchliff Pearson
is here
http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/2013-January/008279.html
She clearly didn't say that CC-by v3 was compatible with the ODbL in the
sense that the ODbL alone would suffice as the distribution licence of
Hi,
Since some genius lacking conscience apparently decided to put the HOT
mailing list in moderated mode before going to sleep, while Cat-5
Hurricane Patricia just made landfall, I am forwarding the imagery
resource below to this list, in case some mappers of the broad OSM
community feel like
7 matches
Mail list logo