Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: Beware Pokemon users

I've so far simply been using a basic query like highway=footway and newer:"2016-12-22:00:00:00" This still requires a lot of manual review, of course. Too much to do in great detail over large areas. I'm sure I'm missing things, but results of this query has identified PoGo mapping problems,

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: Beware Pokemon users

On 2016.12.27. 10:15, David Kewley wrote: > I thought this might be a big problem at first, but now I think it's > probably a net good thing. > > In Southern California, I saw about 40 users join in the first 24-48 > hours after the video was posted (Dec 22), who immediately started > mapping

[OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: Beware Pokemon users

Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Beware Pokemon users Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 00:40:18 +0100 From: Rod Bera To: Andy Mabbett Hi Andy, I get what you mean, and I acknowledge that though I consider OSM should be put first