Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Why doesn't OSM ?

2009-12-27 Thread John Smith
2009/12/28 Aun Johnsen : > John Smith, you can put your money where your mouth is and write a patch, > since you brought this up? I can't do anything until I know what will be protected by SSL, because TomH said they don't even know yet. Until something certain is stated by someone with the abili

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Why doesn't OSM ?

2009-12-27 Thread Aun Johnsen
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > Aun Johnsen wrote: > >>John Smith wrote: >> > Lets assume for a second that they are smart enough to filter their >> > points so they aren't near their home location, we can also assume >> > they may not have vectoris

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Why doesn't OSM ?

2009-12-27 Thread Aun Johnsen
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Matt Amos wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Aun Johnsen > wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Liz wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote: > >> > 1. What do we want to protect? > > > > The data is fully open, but some people wa

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Why doesn't OSM ?

2009-12-27 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, John Smith wrote: > Lets assume for a second that they are smart enough to filter their > points so they aren't near their home location, we can also assume > they may not have vectorised the data, however there is a lot of > non-home/non-work information still not being protected by a simple

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Why doesn't OSM ?

2009-12-27 Thread John Smith
2009/12/28 John Smith : > 2009/12/28 Matt Amos : >> if you are really very concerned with your privacy: don't upload >> tracks which include your home or office locations at all. > > Lets assume for a second that they are smart enough to filter their > points so they aren't near their home location

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Why doesn't OSM ?

2009-12-27 Thread John Smith
2009/12/28 Matt Amos : > if you are really very concerned with your privacy: don't upload > tracks which include your home or office locations at all. Lets assume for a second that they are smart enough to filter their points so they aren't near their home location, we can also assume they may not

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Why doesn't OSM ?

2009-12-27 Thread Matt Amos
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Aun Johnsen wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Liz wrote: >> >> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote: >> > 1. What do we want to protect? > > The data is fully open, but some people want to reduce their fingerprint on > the data to protect themselves,

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Why doesn't OSM ?

2009-12-27 Thread John Smith
2009/12/27 Aun Johnsen : > Taiwan, Sri Lanka, Morocco, Israel, Palestine, Russia, all of these are Then there is China and Iran and various other countries that love to jail their dissidents... As I said before, until any of this has a direct negative effect on people personally they don't see wh

[OSM-talk] Fwd: Why doesn't OSM ?

2009-12-27 Thread Aun Johnsen
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Liz wrote: > On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > 1. What do we want to protect? > The data is fully open, but some people want to reduce their fingerprint on the data to protect themselves, for example they submit their GPX tracks privately so it will

[OSM-talk] Fwd: Why doesn't OSM implement a simple measure to protect it's users and passwords?

2009-12-22 Thread John Smith
-- Forwarded message -- From: John Smith Date: 2009/12/23 Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Why doesn't OSM implement a simple measure to protect it's users and passwords? To: Frederik Ramm 2009/12/23 Frederik Ramm : > Why should we? I gave several good reasons, but you chose to rebuff m