All of the offending data has been removed.
Please let me know if you see anything odd or of the data in your area
of Canada is still there.
Blake
Blake Crosby wrote:
> Just an update...
>
> Ways have been removed, I'm in the process of removing the nodes should
> be done in about 2 hours or
Just an update...
Ways have been removed, I'm in the process of removing the nodes should
be done in about 2 hours or so.
I will post another update when the removal process is complete.
Blake
Blake Crosby wrote:
>> The history also doesn't show a user for the intial way, though this
>> data
> The history also doesn't show a user for the intial way, though this
> data does NEED to be removed immediately.
I am in the process of removing the data now.
This was imported BY MISTAKE, by my self. I didn't even realize it until
the post by Simon.
I'll be more careful in the future.
Blak
Simon Wood wrote:
> Hi all,
> What's the deal with GeoGratis rivers, a whole load have appeared in Southen
> Alberta. They apear to have a low accuracy, so how should 'we' handle it when
> there already is a more accurate way representing a particular river.
>
> Example location:
> http://www.ope
Hi all,
What's the deal with GeoGratis rivers, a whole load have appeared in Southen
Alberta. They apear to have a low accuracy, so how should 'we' handle it when
there already is a more accurate way representing a particular river.
Example location:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.603&lon=
5 matches
Mail list logo
