On Jan 27, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Manfred Podzkiewitz wrote:
Hello, i have a question about the handling of unoffical, or ethnic,
or
historic names of towns and villages.
The TIGER import in the USA uses name_1 for alternate names. Perhaps
we should view all tags starting with name as
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com wrote:
On Jan 27, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Manfred Podzkiewitz wrote:
Hello, i have a question about the handling of unoffical, or ethnic,
or
historic names of towns and villages.
The TIGER import in the USA uses name_1 for alternate
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 02:50:37PM -0500, Russ Nelson wrote:
On Jan 27, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Manfred Podzkiewitz wrote:
Hello, i have a question about the handling of unoffical, or ethnic,
or
historic names of towns and villages.
The TIGER import in the USA uses name_1 for alternate
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 19:57 +, Andy Allan wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com wrote:
On Jan 27, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Manfred Podzkiewitz wrote:
Hello, i have a question about the handling of unoffical, or ethnic,
or
historic names of towns and
Le 27 janv. 09 à 21:02, Simon Ward a écrit :
This doesn’t account for multiple names in the same language,
though. I
can also imagine a place having several old names over time, while
old_name=* really only allows for one.
The general rule in OSM is that multiple values for a tag must be
Andy Allan wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com wrote:
On Jan 27, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Manfred Podzkiewitz wrote:
Hello, i have a question about the handling of unoffical, or ethnic,
or
historic names of towns and villages.
The TIGER import in the USA uses
Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk writes:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 02:50:37PM -0500, Russ Nelson wrote:
On Jan 27, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Manfred Podzkiewitz wrote:
Hello, i have a question about the handling of unoffical, or ethnic,
or
historic names of towns and villages.
The TIGER import
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 04:36:08PM -0500, Matthias Julius wrote:
This doesn’t account for multiple names in the same language, though. I
can also imagine a place having several old names over time, while
old_name=* really only allows for one.
IMHO there really needs to be a well defined
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 04:36:08PM -0500, Matthias Julius wrote:
This doesn't account for multiple names in the same language, though. I
can also imagine a place having several old names over time, while
old_name=*
Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk writes:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 04:36:08PM -0500, Matthias Julius wrote:
That's actually error prone if someone enters a semicolon who doesn't
know about the rule. I think that should better be reversed or '\;'
be used as separator because this is much less
Hi,
The general rule in OSM is that multiple values for a tag must be
separated by a semicolon. [..]
Another general rule in OSM is that OSM only maps features that are
_currently there_. Why should we bother with old city names. They are
replaced and thus obsolete. There is no Leningrad any
11 matches
Mail list logo
