On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Andrew Wiseman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In this case, two businesses closed and were replaced by a single business
> that took over both buildings (they are adjoining.) How should I tag this?
> I didn't see anything about closed: or former: on the wiki.
>
Tag the new bu
2015-12-14 21:08 GMT+01:00 Lester Caine :
> On 14/12/15 17:18, Andrew Wiseman wrote:
> > In this case, two businesses closed and were replaced by a single
> > business that took over both buildings (they are adjoining.) How should
> > I tag this? I didn't see anything about closed: or former: on t
On 14/12/15 17:18, Andrew Wiseman wrote:
> In this case, two businesses closed and were replaced by a single
> business that took over both buildings (they are adjoining.) How should
> I tag this? I didn't see anything about closed: or former: on the wiki.
If the units are individually identified
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:18:41 -0500
Andrew Wiseman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In this case, two businesses closed and were replaced by a single
> business that took over both buildings (they are adjoining.) How
> should I tag this? I didn't see anything about closed: or former: on
> the wiki.
>
> Thanks,
I usually just either replace the tags of the node with the info for the
new business (example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1400581558/history) ,
or in your case, the tags of the buildings. Perhaps merge the buildings
also if they are functionally one structure?
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:2
Hi,
In this case, two businesses closed and were replaced by a single business
that took over both buildings (they are adjoining.) How should I tag this?
I didn't see anything about closed: or former: on the wiki.
Thanks,
Andrew
--
600,000 DC residents don't have a vote in Congress -- http://
6 matches
Mail list logo