On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> - Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>>> Greg Troxel wrote:
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of th=
> e
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we=
> all
think of that as so
> - Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>> Greg Troxel wrote:
>>> I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of th=
e
>>> buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we=
all
>>> think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
>> highway=3Dunclassified fo
I'd have said a pedestrian street was one which (often through conversion)
is now primarily for access on foot, and pretty much unsegregated (ie no
kerbs, and not much paving differentiation). Access varies (can be bicycles,
motorcycles or even some cars - eg Lucca in Italy). It doesn't only apply
2009/5/29 Greg Troxel :
>
> Isn't that highway=pedestrian exactly? As for cars I think it might
> be a physical impossibility rather than permitted / not permitted.
> (But for routing purposes it's just the same.)
well, IMHO it's not, as "pedestrian" are streets not generally allowed
to cars,
Isn't that highway=pedestrian exactly? As for cars I think it might
be a physical impossibility rather than permitted / not permitted.
(But for routing purposes it's just the same.)
I suppose it is, except that really it's highway=motorcycle.
My real point was that the whole 'highway' con
2009/5/29 Greg Troxel :
>
> I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
> buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
> think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
>
> residential doesn't imply sidewalks in my area
>
> So is there a
2009/5/29 Paul Johnson :
- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
> Greg Troxel wrote:
>> I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
>> buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
>> think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
>
> highway=u
Greg Troxel wrote:
> I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
> buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
> think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
highway=unclassified for now (and throw a fixme= tag explaining the
situ
2009/5/28 Richard Mann :
> I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
> buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
> think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
residential don't have to have pavements, but the width should be at
lea
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
residential doesn't imply sidewalks in my area
So is there any objection to highway=pedestria
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Frank Sautter
wrote:
> so highway=service has no meaning about public accessability. this is
> done using the access tag.
> highway=service just means this is a road that is not as wide as a
> highway=residential.
>
No, the definition does not say anything about t
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
So is there any objection to highway=pedestrian+bicycle=yes+motorcycle=yes?
Richard
On Thu, May 28, 2
On Thursday 28 May 2009, you wrote:
> Ben Laenen wrote:
> > It's clearly a public road so you shouldn't use highway=service
> > here.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway says about
> highway=service: "Generally for access to a building, motorway
> service station, beach, campsite, indust
Ben Laenen wrote:
> It's clearly a public road so you shouldn't use highway=service here.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway says about highway=service:
"Generally for access to a building, motorway service station, beach,
campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc.. This is also comm
Am 26.05.2009 12:29, Ben Laenen:
> On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Ivan Garcia wrote:
>>> Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm
>>> will be the same than a normal residential street
>> No, I guess, it will have a
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> 2009/5/26 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason :
>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Ivan Garcia wrote:
>>> Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be the
>>> same than a normal residential street, what highway tag can I use to
>>> differentiate this al
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Ben Laenen wrote:
> > It's clearly a public road so you shouldn't use highway=service
> > here.
>
> Alleyways are clearly public roads, and those are highway=service
> service=alley...
But I think there's a big difference in alleys that should be tagg
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> 2009/5/26 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason :
>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Ivan Garcia wrote:
>>> Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be the
>>> same than a normal residential street, what highway tag can I use to
>>> differentiate this al
2009/5/26 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason :
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Ivan Garcia wrote:
>> Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be the
>> same than a normal residential street, what highway tag can I use to
>> differentiate this allewys in the rendered map?
>
> T
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> It's clearly a public road so you shouldn't use highway=service here.
>
> Alleyways are clearly public roads, and those are highway=service
> service=alley...
>
Why you don't create a highway=alley and just keep highway=service for
service r
Ben Laenen wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Ivan Garcia wrote:
>>> Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm
>>> will be the same than a normal residential street
>> No, I guess, it will have a red dashed tran
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
> This looks like a:
>
> highway=service
> service=alley
> access=no
> foot=yes
> bicycle=yes
> motorcycle=yes
>
So, you "incidentally" tag for the renderers ;-)
I always understood highway=service as a service road accessible for ca
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Ivan Garcia wrote:
> Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be the
> same than a normal residential street, what highway tag can I use to
> differentiate this allewys in the rendered map?
This looks like a:
highway=service
service=a
2009/5/26 andrzej zaborowski :
> I normally use highway=pedestrian for this kind of streets in city
> centres (especially mediterranean), here I'd add motorcycle=yes but
> definitely wouldn't use access=no.
I would use highway=footway, as pedestrian I see for ways that are
broad like streets. It d
2009/5/26 Paul Johnson :
> Ivan Garcia wrote:
>> Hi, could you tell me by looking at this picture [1] how to tag this in
>> OSM ?
>>
>> http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8Y0T3EnBVPw/SJcJ13KnOII/BCg/ot4X2My6CvA/s400/vietnam%2Balley.jpg
>>
>> It's an alley where only people/motorbikes can go.
>
> acc
> > And I guess it should be rather highway=service than
> > highway=residental. That changes rendering a bit too (it is narrower
> > in Mapnik IIRC).
>
> What was that again with the "don't tag for the renderer" meme? :-)
>
> It's clearly a public road so you shouldn't use highway=service here.
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Ivan Garcia wrote:
> > Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm
> > will be the same than a normal residential street
>
> No, I guess, it will have a red dashed transparent line drawn o
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Ivan Garcia wrote:
> Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be
> the same than a normal residential street
No, I guess, it will have a red dashed transparent line drawn over it,
meaning „restricted access”. No more details, th
Ivan Garcia wrote:
> Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be the
> same than a normal residential street, what highway tag can I use to
> differentiate this allewys in the rendered map?
Maybe highway=service?
In the map_features it says "Sometimes called an alley,
Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be the
same than a normal residential street, what highway tag can I use to
differentiate this allewys in the rendered map?
Best Regards.
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Ivan Garcia wrote:
> > Hi, could
Ivan Garcia wrote:
> Hi, could you tell me by looking at this picture [1] how to tag this in
> OSM ?
>
> http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8Y0T3EnBVPw/SJcJ13KnOII/BCg/ot4X2My6CvA/s400/vietnam%2Balley.jpg
>
> It's an alley where only people/motorbikes can go.
access=no
foot=yes
bicycle=yes (I ass
Hi, could you tell me by looking at this picture [1] how to tag this in OSM
?
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8Y0T3EnBVPw/SJcJ13KnOII/BCg/ot4X2My6CvA/s400/vietnam%2Balley.jpg
It's an alley where only people/motorbikes can go.
Best Regards.
Ivan.
___
32 matches
Mail list logo
