> The simplify way action uses the Douglas-Peucker algorithm. You can change
> its tolerance (in meters) by modifying the "simplify-way.max-error" preference
> (go to the preferences tab, click on the Einstein face, and click "Add").
> Only nodes that are within the tolerance of the simplified wa
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:38:48AM +0200, Gabriel Ebner wrote:
>
> Fixed in OSM r9100,
Verified: fantastic!
This is another tale for those that - now and then - come up and
say that nobody is accountable for free software.
Thank you, Gabriel!
--
Niccolo Rigacci
Firenze - Italy
_
2008/7/16 Gabriel Ebner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Oops. This is pretty embarrassing, but it seems I forgot to convert degrees
> to radians before calculating the cross track error...
As long as we're on the subject...
I tend to find that I can't simplify ways at all, unless I first split
them. Gen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:02:44PM +0200, Niccolo Rigacci wrote:
> > Could you please post the way that shows this problem? (Is it by chance a
> > closed way?)
>
> No, it is a simple open way. Here http://www.rigacci.org/osm/bug/
> you can find:
>
> - a screenshot of the simplified way over the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:16:34PM +0200, Gabriel Ebner wrote:
> > Do you think that I should contact the developers?
>
> You've already done that as I'm the one to be blamed for that code.
That's fantastic! :-)
> Could you please post the way that shows this problem? (Is it by chance a
> close
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:29:35AM +0200, Niccolo Rigacci wrote:
> > By default it uses a tolerance of 50 meters, so if you want less points to
> > be
> > removed, you might want to set this to, say, 10 meters.
>
> This is why I suppose a bug in the tool: the resulting way is far
> from the orig
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:54:32PM +, Gabriel Ebner wrote:
> The simplify way action uses the Douglas-Peucker algorithm. You can change
> its tolerance (in meters) by modifying the "simplify-way.max-error" preference
> (go to the preferences tab, click on the Einstein face, and click "Add").
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:26:39PM +0200, Niccolo Rigacci wrote:
> > Don't rely on automated simplifiers for conversion of GPS data, do it by
> > hand.
>
> Why not?
>
> I suppose the algorithm is well known and definited: nodes should
> be removed only if the semplified way does not diverge by
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 05:42:36PM +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
> >
> > I use regularly the Simplify Way feature in Josm before uploading
> > tracks acquired at 10 m samples.
>
> Uploading as vector data to the main database, or as a simplified GPS track?
I do the following:
- Open GPX in Josm
- C
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Niccolo Rigacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use regularly the Simplify Way feature in Josm before uploading
> tracks acquired at 10 m samples.
Uploading as vector data to the main database, or as a simplified GPS track?
> Today I noticed that the funcio
Hi,
I use regularly the Simplify Way feature in Josm before uploading
tracks acquired at 10 m samples.
Today I noticed that the funcion over-simplify a trace: the worst
node in the resulting way is more than 200 m far from the
original track!
Here [1] you can see a screenshot of the simplifie
11 matches
Mail list logo
