On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 01:27:11 +0100
Chris Browet wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, where is Landsat more detailed than Bing or
> Yahoo?
>
> - Chris -
plenty of places near me
ie western NSW, australia
where there is no nearmap coverage nearmap then defaults to landsat, so
I am still using landsat
Hi,
2011/1/10 Stephan Knauss :
> On 10.01.2011 00:10, Vincent Pottier wrote:
>>
>> In JOSM I use
>> Landsat (mirroir) wms:http://irs.gis-lab.info/?layers=landsat&;
>
> that returnes totally blurred images when compared to the original ones.
Could you please give an example? I didn't find one when
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 23:13, Stephan Knauss wrote:
> They suggest to use tiled WMS.
>
Unfortunately, they decided to create their own extension for a "tiled WMS"
(i.e. not WMS-C nor TMS) which, AFAIK, they are alone to use.
It makes it a bit pointless for developers to support it
Just out
On 10.01.2011 00:10, Vincent Pottier wrote:
In JOSM I use
Landsat (mirroir) wms:http://irs.gis-lab.info/?layers=landsat&;
that returnes totally blurred images when compared to the original ones.
I thought it could be an issue with resizing the pictures before
delivering. Even tried to contact
Le 09/01/2011 23:13, Stephan Knauss a écrit :
Hi,
The landsat WMS service is dead.
Server returns this:
This server no longer provides full WMS services!
They suggest to use tiled WMS.
Is this working with JOSM?
http://onearth.jpl.nasa.gov/
Unfortunately for many areas Landsat is still the
Hi,
The landsat WMS service is dead.
Server returns this:
This server no longer provides full WMS services!
They suggest to use tiled WMS.
Is this working with JOSM?
http://onearth.jpl.nasa.gov/
Unfortunately for many areas Landsat is still the best available imagery
source.
Stephan
___
6 matches
Mail list logo
