Re: [OSM-talk] Landuse vs Vegetation vs Landcover proposed cleanup at wiki

> > 2014-11-30 12:53 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. : > The problem is not only that forest can be mapped as either > landuse,landcover > or natural. > > I'm also interested in this topic. I think it is not a problem to have different keys, because there are different aspects of the same "object" that deserv

Re: [OSM-talk] Landuse vs Vegetation vs Landcover proposed cleanup at wiki

If I understand correctly we are talking about combining 3 similar wiki pages into 1, not changing any tagging, in which case it makes sense. In my opinion the wiki needs more how to tag instructions (e.g. links to videos showing how in basic mode in most popular editors) as well as the existing ta

Re: [OSM-talk] Landuse vs Vegetation vs Landcover proposed cleanup at wiki

On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:04:28AM +0400, Никита wrote: > We have highly inconsistent content at wiki (feature pages > ). Inconsistency is > not limited to landuse=wood/natural=forest. Another example is > landuse=meadow (Landuse

[OSM-talk] Landuse vs Vegetation vs Landcover proposed cleanup at wiki

We have highly inconsistent content at wiki (feature pages ). Inconsistency is not limited to landuse=wood/natural=forest. Another example is landuse=meadow (Landuse , Vegetation