Re: [OSM-talk] Large cadastral polygons

2020-06-13 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 12. Jun 2020, at 17:39, Paul Johnson wrote: > > Not just that, but cadastral type tags probably shouldn't be spanning large > areas to start with. If your landuse or landcover polygon is crossing an > unclassified or higher highway, you're probably making a big

Re: [OSM-talk] Large cadastral polygons

2020-06-12 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 6:32 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13/6/20 1:37 am, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:28 AM Florian Lohoff wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:14:15PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via talk >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > Jun 12, 2020, 13:59 by

Re: [OSM-talk] Large cadastral polygons

2020-06-12 Thread Warin
On 13/6/20 1:37 am, Paul Johnson wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:28 AM Florian Lohoff > wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:14:15PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > > > > Jun 12, 2020, 13:59 by f...@zz.de : > > >

[OSM-talk] Large cadastral polygons

2020-06-12 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:28 AM Florian Lohoff wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:14:15PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > > > > > > > > Jun 12, 2020, 13:59 by f...@zz.de: > > > > > Changeset envelopes which span more than 100s of km² are broken. > > > > > Except cases where you