Now that the redaction bot has finished, what is remaining to bless the
database as ODBL?
Just asking because it will be good to see some of the consumers be
able to switch to pulling their feeds from the new license rather than
displaying data from April 2012.
Do we need to consider the ways that have been derived from GPS tracks that
were licensed CC-by-SA and tag values such as road names where the original
has been replaced but tag information has been copied over for our
consumers to be reassured the data is .ODBL clean?
Cheerio John
On 13 August 2
On 13 August 2012 18:05, john whelan wrote:
> Do we need to consider the ways that have been derived from GPS tracks that
> were licensed CC-by-SA and tag values such as road names where the original
> has been replaced but tag information has been copied over for our consumers
> to be reassured t
"On 13 August 2012 17:06, Mike N wrote:
> Now that the redaction bot has finished, what is remaining to bless the
> database as ODBL?
>
> Just asking because it will be good to see some of the consumers be able
> to switch to pulling their feeds from the new license rather than displaying
> data f
The LWG meets once per week and, you wouldn't believe it, in general has
its minutes online shortly afterwards.
Our take on the change over is here:
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1j4wiDqukbRGNDh9kC-cUL6j3t4NhlcVgancqieHywK0
Work has been progressing on the open issue listen in item 6,
On 16 August 2012 10:34, Simon Poole wrote:
> The LWG meets once per week and, you wouldn't believe it, in general has
> its minutes online shortly afterwards.
>
> Our take on the change over is here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1j4wiDqukbRGNDh9kC-cUL6j3t4NhlcVgancqieHywK0
>
> Work h
6 matches
Mail list logo
