Re: [OSM-talk] mechanical edits was:Proposed mechanical edit - elimination of osmarender:nameDirection - blatant tagging for the renderer

Mar 23, 2019, 7:09 PM by matkoni...@tutanota.com: > Mar 23, 2019, 6:17 PM by > si...@poole.ch > : > >> >> >> >> Am 23.03.2019 um 13:28 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: >> >>> I opened >>> https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/17512 >>>

Re: [OSM-talk] mechanical edits was:Proposed mechanical edit - elimination of osmarender:nameDirection - blatant tagging for the renderer

Mar 23, 2019, 6:17 PM by si...@poole.ch : > > > > Am 23.03.2019 um 13:28 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > >> >> >> >> Mar 23, 2019, 1:04 PM by >> ajt1...@gmail.com >> : >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 3/23/19 11:46 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >>>

Re: [OSM-talk] Mechanical edits

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:12:24PM +0200, Michael Reichert wrote: > A large bounding box of a changeset is not a proof that the edit is > mechanical. There are also users at OSM who first edit an object in > Europe and afterwards in America before they upload their changes. (This > usually happens

Re: [OSM-talk] Mechanical edits

On 6/29/2015 11:12 AM, Michael Reichert wrote: That's why I think that there should be no restriction on API side. Either people realize that mechanical edits have to be disussed first (after revert of their first undiscussed mechanical edit) or they get blocked if they refuse contact with the co

Re: [OSM-talk] Mechanical edits

> A large bounding box of a changeset is not a proof that the edit is > mechanical. There are also users at OSM who first edit an object in > Europe and afterwards in America before they upload their changes. (This > usually happens if the user uses JOSM oder Potlatch 2) On the other > hand, it is

Re: [OSM-talk] Mechanical edits

Hi Andrew, Am 2015-06-29 um 17:01 schrieb Andrew MacKinnon: > I admit that I have been guilty of doing inappropriate mechanical > edits in the past, but I am wondering: is it time that OSM implements > controls on doing mechanical edits in the API? In other words, should > OSM implement a feature

[OSM-talk] Mechanical edits

Recently we have been having a problem with several users doing mechanical edits to add the prefix "ON" to the ref of every highway in Ontario. The Canadian OSM community is unhappy with this. I admit that I have been guilty of doing inappropriate mechanical edits in the past, but I am wondering: