2010/11/4 Tim Waters :
> It's around this time of year that we start thinking about funny Christmas
> styled maps, with snowmen, and frosty trees...
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenSantaMap
> :-)
Last year there was a German Project within OSM collecting positions
of places where they s
On 3 November 2010 14:37, Donald Campbell II wrote:
> Yeah that Glittermap is great stuff I gotta thank you for freeing my mind
> of the constraints of stuffy boring mapping.
>
> Now I'm thinking of cartoon style maps with text effect scripts run on
> Country/City/Town names...
>
> Old fashioned p
Yeah that Glittermap is great stuff I gotta thank you for freeing my mind of
the constraints of stuffy boring mapping.
Now I'm thinking of cartoon style maps with text effect scripts run on
Country/City/Town names...
Old fashioned piratey maps with dragons in the water...
Flippin' SpongeBob maps
On 3 November 2010 12:47, Kate Chapman wrote:
> Probably all of those in this category on the wiki:)
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Groupies_of_IvanSanchez
>
> Long live the Glittermap!
>
> indeed! We still need a better Glittermap!
Emilie Laffray
___
Probably all of those in this category on the wiki:)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Groupies_of_IvanSanchez
Long live the Glittermap!
-Kate
2010/11/2 Peter :
> Err, are you alright? "TEH GLITTERMAP!!!1!" LAWLZ!
> So let's see hw many people actally use teh glitterthing...
>
> 2010/
El día Wednesday 03 November 2010 09:27:58, Maarten Deen dijo:
> If you put the glitter on roads only then it looks just like busy
> traffic ;)
> Connect it with traffic information and you'll get a visual traffic
> monitor.
*head asplodes*
The crazier thing is, it's doable. We need transiki rig
2010/11/3 Martijn van Exel :
> This should be a featured image. I mean, really.
I agree, it's quite nice and unique (at least I haven't seen that before).
cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listi
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:10:55 +0100, Martijn van Exel
wrote:
> This should be a featured image. I mean, really.
If you put the glitter on roads only then it looks just like busy
traffic ;)
Connect it with traffic information and you'll get a visual traffic
monitor.
Cool stuff!
Maarten
> On Nov 2
This should be a featured image. I mean, really.
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
Laziness – Impatience – Hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl | http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
twitter: mvexel
skype: mvexel
flickr: rhodes
On Nov 2, 2010, at 11:47 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote
2010/11/2 Iván Sánchez Ortega :
> http://ivan.sanchezortega.es/glittermap/
Excellent. Now all it needs is some !
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Err, are you alright? "TEH GLITTERMAP!!!1!" LAWLZ!
So let's see hw many people actally use teh glitterthing...
2010/11/2 Iván Sánchez Ortega :
> On Tuesday 02 November 2010 20:32:15 Kay Drangmeister wrote:
>> After lots of discussions about how layered maps could be made more user
>> friendly, her
On Tuesday 02 November 2010 20:32:15 Kay Drangmeister wrote:
> After lots of discussions about how layered maps could be made more user
> friendly, here's an easy fix: a desaturated mapnik base layer.
Desaturated? Black & white? That's your idea of user-friendly??
Everyone knows that user-friend
Hi Kay,
I like the idea of a more subdued style for use as backdrop maps. I think this
one still has too much contrast for that purpose.
I propose something along the lines of
http://maps.cloudmade.com/?lat=52.371826&lng=4.928055&zoom=12&styleId=26171&opened_tab=0
May I take this opportunity
Am 02.11.2010 21:34, schrieb Richard Weait:
I thought the style was very nice before everybody hammered your server. ;-)
One more thing:
yources to all styles rendered on the toolserver are here:
http://svn.toolserver.org/svnroot/p_osm/styles/
Peter
__
Am 02.11.2010 21:34, schrieb Richard Weait:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Peter Körner wrote:
Please be patient with the toolserver, most tiles in the bw-mapnik and
bw-noicons style are not yet rendered, so there're still a lot 404 error,
but this will solve itsself as soon as the maps are in
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Peter Körner wrote:
> Please be patient with the toolserver, most tiles in the bw-mapnik and
> bw-noicons style are not yet rendered, so there're still a lot 404 error,
> but this will solve itsself as soon as the maps are in a wider use.
I thought the style was ve
Please be patient with the toolserver, most tiles in the bw-mapnik and
bw-noicons style are not yet rendered, so there're still a lot 404
error, but this will solve itsself as soon as the maps are in a wider use.
Peter
Am 02.11.2010 20:32, schrieb Kay Drangmeister:
Hi
After lots of discussio
Hi
After lots of discussions about how layered maps could be made more user
friendly, here's an easy fix: a desaturated mapnik base layer. For even
reduced information, a "no icons" form of the map is presented.
Here is an example set:
original mapnik:
http://toolserver.org/~osm/styles/?zoom=17
18 matches
Mail list logo
