On 04/11/2015 17:36, Lester Caine wrote:
The simple answer is secondary, tertiary and unclassified roads in
many areas of the world have the same importance, so rendering them
drastically differently is a mistake!
If, as you state, there are no differences in some areas, they shouldn't
be tag
W dniu 04.11.2015 18:36, Lester Caine napisał(a):
The simple answer is secondary, tertiary and unclassified roads in many
areas of the world have the same importance, so rendering them
drastically differently is a mistake!
As the problem of rendering tertiary roads seems to be still not
resol
W dniu 03.11.2015 18:40, Daniel Koć napisał(a):
W dniu 03.11.2015 13:17, Dave F. napisał(a):
2. Road widths
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CS4l8ZKWUAA-566.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CS4tfRDWUAA6AkN.png
As can be seen, there's a problem with the new increased widths. At
interchanges individua
De : Pieren
À : talk@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : Mercredi 4 novembre 2015 13h08
Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Carto: White Roads & Road Widths
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> tertiaries are still rendered, they just don't have a different col
On 04/11/15 12:08, Pieren wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> > tertiaries are still rendered, they just don't have a different colour
>> > than other roads (but they are thicker). In German we say: remain on the
>> > carpet ;-)
> Well, I would say in English
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> tertiaries are still rendered, they just don't have a different colour than
> other roads (but they are thicker). In German we say: remain on the carpet ;-)
Well, I would say in English "you play with words". It's not visible
as a spec
Am 04.11.2015 um 06:06 schrieb Max:
> Could the renderer take the number of lanes and/or with information of
> the road into account? Then we would not have this issue.
>
The rendering database currently does not include the lanes value, or
put differently any such feature would have to weight f
On 04/11/15 01:06, Dave F. wrote:
>
> Hmm... Interesting; I notice nearby that motorway & links are now
> rendered as I suggested:
>
> http://bl.ocks.org/tyrasd/raw/6164696/#18.00/1.29498/103.87800
>
> However it doesn't for trunk_link:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.39961/-2.33758
>
On 2015년 11월 03일 21:17, Dave F. wrote:
>
> 2. Road widths
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CS4l8ZKWUAA-566.jpg
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CS4tfRDWUAA6AkN.png
>
> As can be seen, there's a problem with the new increased widths. At
> interchanges individually mapped lanes are overlapping turning it
Thanks for that.
Hmm... Interesting; I notice nearby that motorway & links are now
rendered as I suggested:
http://bl.ocks.org/tyrasd/raw/6164696/#18.00/1.29498/103.87800
However it doesn't for trunk_link:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.39961/-2.33758
Maybe it should? (I haven't tes
W dniu 03.11.2015 13:17, Dave F. napisał(a):
2. Road widths
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CS4l8ZKWUAA-566.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CS4tfRDWUAA6AkN.png
As can be seen, there's a problem with the new increased widths. At
interchanges individually mapped lanes are overlapping turning it into
sent from a phone
> Am 03.11.2015 um 16:47 schrieb Pieren :
>
> I didn't express myself since a long time on this list. I just
> discovered the new style and wanted to undestand how it was possible
> to kill the tertiary road type in OSM. Because it must be clear : if a
> road class is not rend
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> Also not correct, various alternatives were tested, samples were shown,
> areas where problems occur were mentioned, advantages and disadvantages
> of various options mentioned, you can hardly cover this more in depth
> than this.
>
> Not
On 03/11/15 14:39, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> Note ultimately design decisions are always subjective. If at the end
> of a long process a decision is made without once more listing in depth
> all arguments for and against it this does not mean the decision is
> arbitrary.
A 'long process' carr
On Tuesday 03 November 2015, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
> >
> > That is not correct, Mateusz put quite some time into trying
> > different alternatives for tertiary roads and there was plenty of
> > opportunity for all interested parties to participate in discussion
> > with suggestions and arg
Þann 03.11.2015 14:08, Christoph Hormann reit:
On Tuesday 03 November 2015, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
As an active participant in the discussion (mostly advocating for
tertiary to be colored) I have to say that "in depth" doesn't really
describe how the decision was taken regarding tertiar
On Tuesday 03 November 2015, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
>
> As an active participant in the discussion (mostly advocating for
> tertiary to be colored) I have to say that "in depth" doesn't really
> describe how the decision was taken regarding tertiary color. The
> answer to that was basically
Þann 03.11.2015 12:46, Christoph Hormann reit:
This is a lot of material to review but it is highly recommended to
work
through that before you make specific suggestions for changes because
otherwise you are very likely to frustrate those who participated in
those previous discussions by bringin
On Tuesday 03 November 2015, Dave F. wrote:
>
> 1. Tertiary roads being rendered white. This, by my count, brings the
> total rendered that colour to four: Tertiary, Residential, Service &
> Unclassified. Surely clearly distinguishing between very different
> classifications using colour make the m
On Tue Nov 3 12:17:21 2015 GMT, Dave F. wrote
>
> 2. Road widths
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CS4l8ZKWUAA-566.jpg
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CS4tfRDWUAA6AkN.png
>
> As can be seen, there's a problem with the new increased widths. At
> interchanges individually mapped lanes are overlapping
Hi
Two points regarding the recent OSM carto updates:
1. Tertiary roads being rendered white. This, by my count, brings the
total rendered that colour to four: Tertiary, Residential, Service &
Unclassified. Surely clearly distinguishing between very different
classifications using colour make
21 matches
Mail list logo
