- Original Message -
From: "Martijn van Oosterhout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Groom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New Zealand coastline and mapnik
> On Dec 27, 2007 5:23 PM, Da
On Dec 27, 2007 5:23 PM, David Groom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wasn't there some issue that the shapes needed to be sliced up into a square
> grid, or are Kleptog's already sliced?
That's already done. Don't tell me you never noticed the faint grid
lines in the error checker?
Anyway, the shape
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Burgess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; "Martijn van Oosterhout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New Zealand coastline and mapnik
> On 24/12/2007, Ben Laenen <[EM
On 25/12/2007, Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 25, 2007 7:50 AM, Alex S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jon Burgess wrote:
> > > On 24/12/2007, Alex S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I stopped importing coastlines when I saw the argument about
> deprecating
> > >> it
On Dec 25, 2007 7:50 AM, Alex S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Burgess wrote:
> > On 24/12/2007, Alex S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I stopped importing coastlines when I saw the argument about deprecating
> >> it and purging the db of uploaded coastlines in favor of the vmap0 data.
> >
> >
Jon Burgess wrote:
> On 24/12/2007, Alex S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I stopped importing coastlines when I saw the argument about deprecating
>> it and purging the db of uploaded coastlines in favor of the vmap0 data.
>
> I don't remember anyone saying that.
I see that it apparently has, in
On Dec 24, 2007 5:12 PM, Jon Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 24/12/2007, Andy Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 24, 2007 2:43 PM, Jon Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 24/12/2007, Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Monday 24 December 2007, Rob Reid wrote:
On 24/12/2007, Andy Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2007 2:43 PM, Jon Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 24/12/2007, Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Monday 24 December 2007, Rob Reid wrote:
> > > > It has also been tidied up in places where high res Yahoo imagery
On 24/12/2007, Alex S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Burgess wrote:
> > I can update the renderer to use a different shapefile fairly easily
> > but the issue right now is that the coastline data is incomplete for
> > the rest of the world (with most of the US underwater).
> [..]
> > It would be
Jon Burgess wrote:
> I can update the renderer to use a different shapefile fairly easily
> but the issue right now is that the coastline data is incomplete for
> the rest of the world (with most of the US underwater).
[..]
> It would be a lot easier if we could use the new data for the whole
> wor
On Dec 24, 2007 2:43 PM, Jon Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24/12/2007, Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 24 December 2007, Rob Reid wrote:
> > > It has also been tidied up in places where high res Yahoo imagery is
> > > available.
> > > What needs to happen now so that i
On Dec 24, 2007 1:22 PM, Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A question which I've been asking myself, since things like this aren't
> exactly pretty results:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.2573&lon=4.3559&zoom=14&layers=B0F
> but I have no idea how to update the Mapnik data...
The NL
On 24/12/2007, Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 24 December 2007, Rob Reid wrote:
> > It has also been tidied up in places where high res Yahoo imagery is
> > available.
> > What needs to happen now so that it appears correctly for Mapnik zoom
> > levels 10 and above?
>
> A questio
On Monday 24 December 2007, Rob Reid wrote:
> It has also been tidied up in places where high res Yahoo imagery is
> available.
> What needs to happen now so that it appears correctly for Mapnik zoom
> levels 10 and above?
A question which I've been asking myself, since things like this aren't
ex
On Dec 24, 2007 2:57 AM, Rob Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The NZ coastline gets a clean bill of health from the Coastline error
> checker except for two small islands which appear to obey the rules in
> terms of number of nodes and direction of way.
> It has also been tidied up in places where
The NZ coastline gets a clean bill of health from the Coastline error
checker except for two small islands which appear to obey the rules in
terms of number of nodes and direction of way.
It has also been tidied up in places where high res Yahoo imagery is
available.
What needs to happen now so
16 matches
Mail list logo
