[OSM-talk] Notability (was openstreetmap)

I agree. I think we need to adopt a Wikipedia concept of 'notability'. For example... A wood is notable, a large established solitary tree in a park might be notable, but a nettle is not. Is a rare plant notable? I would If someone made the effort to physically survey it and properly tag it, I

Re: [OSM-talk] Notability (was openstreetmap)

Nic Roets wrote: If someone made the effort to physically survey it and properly tag it, I think it's OK. Maintainability is probably a bigger issue than notability. Roads, railways and canals don't move much, rivers hardly at all - we can cope with maintaining that sort of database. But

Re: [OSM-talk] Notability (was openstreetmap)

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nic Roets wrote: If someone made the effort to physically survey it and properly tag it, I think it's OK. Maintainability is probably a bigger issue than notability. Roads, railways and canals don't move much,

Re: [OSM-talk] Notability (was openstreetmap)

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Andrew MacKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nic Roets wrote: If someone made the effort to physically survey it and properly tag it, I think it's OK. Maintainability is