Re: [OSM-talk] OSM-to-PostGIS issues

Yes, sorry, here is the command and error message: http://www.prodevelop.es/files/fm/public/downloads/wxp_console.png   Regards, Juan Lucas --- On Mon, 7/19/10, Graham Jones grahamjones...@googlemail.com wrote: From: Graham Jones grahamjones...@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OSM

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM-to-PostGIS issues

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio juan_lucas...@yahoo.com wrote: Yes, sorry, here is the command and error message: http://www.prodevelop.es/files/fm/public/downloads/wxp_console.png Slim uses 800MB of ram as a cache by default (change with -C) Postgresql is

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM-to-PostGIS issues

Am 19.07.2010 12:33, schrieb Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio: Hello, list: I've tried to export a 9.5 GB (150 GB uncomp.) planet to a PostGIS DB @ localhost on a Windows XP machine (1.5 GB RAM). That's very low memory. WinXP takes at least 523 MB so only 1 GB is avail. for the planet import. In

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM-to-PostGIS issues

] OSM-to-PostGIS issues To: Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio juan_lucas...@yahoo.com Cc: Graham Jones grahamjones...@googlemail.com, talk@openstreetmap.org Date: Monday, July 19, 2010, 4:47 PM On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio juan_lucas...@yahoo.com wrote: Yes, sorry, here

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM-to-PostGIS issues

Hi Juan, On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio juan_lucas...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, Are you taking into account Windows XP's virtual memory (4 GB, I think)? I meant 1.5 GB of physical memory. I'm pretty sure they were talking about physical memory. Using virtual