Hi Lester,
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/52.3790/-1.4692 is a perfect
example, where a small roundabout has evolved into a much larger one,
but the new through route is still being excavated. The problem with
this is while it is a good approximation of how work is progressing,
many of
On 03/09/15 09:34, Roland Olbricht wrote:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/52.3790/-1.4692 is a perfect
>> example, where a small roundabout has evolved into a much larger one,
>> but the new through route is still being excavated. The problem with
>> this is while it is a good
On 25/08/15 16:29, Tom MacWright wrote:
All of the resources you linked, you can improve!
* https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm
*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Beginners%27_guideaction=edit
*
On 8/25/2015 5:29 PM, Tom MacWright wrote:
Hi Lester,
All of the resources you linked, you can improve!
* https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm
*
Here is the ticket I just created for learnosm, and if I can get the
site updated soon'ish I will, because it does matter to me :)
On 25/08/2015, Blake Girardot bgirar...@gmail.com wrote:
But in general if you want to map from scratch, make a new layer, map,
merge layers, replace geometry, done, history retained and you mapped
from scratch.
I wonder if JOSM could do that automatically. Before uploading, JOSM
would look at
Retaining the history is the most respectful thing you can do for
mappers but I have seen a lot of new'ish mappers who feel that just
deleting and starting over is easier.
In JOSM the replace geometry function can be used and it will retain
the history and lets you map from scratch and
On 25/08/15 15:10, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Because 'it's easier to delete and start
again' is encouraged rather than 'preserve the history of development'
where someone HAS already spent the time doing that in the past so much
is being lost!
can you expand on this? Where are people
sent from a phone
Am 24.08.2015 um 10:05 schrieb Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
Because 'it's easier to delete and start
again' is encouraged rather than 'preserve the history of development'
where someone HAS already spent the time doing that in the past so much
is being lost!
can
Hi Lester,
All of the resources you linked, you can improve!
* https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm
*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Beginners%27_guideaction=edit
*
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Editing_Standards_and_Conventionsaction=edit
You should fix these
On 25/08/15 17:24, Tom MacWright wrote:
It seems like the only thing you're contributing is negativity.
http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/OSM+Development
Not that I've got all the latest crib sheets working yet :(
Last system I had fully functional was on an SUSE 12.3
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
It seems like the only thing you're contributing is negativity.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
On 25/08/15 16:29, Tom MacWright wrote:
All of the resources you linked, you can improve!
* https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm
*
I'm talking basically about the UK here but I know of similar examples
in the States and Australia and I assume the same rules can be applied
world wide.
There are a large number of structures currently mapped that require
prior knowledge to establish their existence and previous usage.
Railways,
12 matches
Mail list logo
