2015-11-05 13:19 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole :
> Essentially I would view the references in the guideline as real world
> features and their properties given that the OSM data model allows for
> lots of ways a feature can be modelled
>
Doesn't the real world have even more ways of being interpreted? "
2015-11-05 13:36 GMT+01:00 Greg Troxel :
> I also don't understand precisely what the guideline means. It seems
> the ODbL means what the courts say the text means, so the guideline is
> really a statement of how OSMF and the community view the edge cases,
> which could well give weight to a case
Simon Poole writes:
> If you have any feedback, questions of suggestions, please respond soon.
> I'm planning on a final review and potential approval at the upcoming
> LWG meeting on Tuesday and proceeding to formal board approval and
> publishing in a matter of days.
>
> The text can be found
Am 05.11.2015 um 11:22 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> are we going to define "geometry type", "primary feature data" and
> "primary map feature"? E.g. is a "multiline string" or a "group of
> nodes" a geometry type?
> What is a "property" and how is it different to a "primary map
> feature" or
2015-11-05 10:21 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole :
> If you have any feedback, questions of suggestions, please respond soon.
> I'm planning on a final review and potential approval at the upcoming
> LWG meeting on Tuesday and proceeding to formal board approval and
> publishing in a matter of days.
>
are
You may have seen an early version of this either on legal-talk or via
WeeklyOSM/WochenNotiz. It's gone through a number of revisions since
then and has incorporated input from a number of sources. Thanks to
everybody that took the time to work on it. Content wise this version is
slightly less tec
6 matches
Mail list logo
