Thank you everyone for the very informative replies. I've decided to
use GPLv3. (And I think the difference between it and MIT is negligible
in practice for this particular use case)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetm
Hi Safwat,
I thought about your hypothetical, and if someone was using a personally
modified bot for personal use, the AGPL does not impose different
conditions than GPL ("if you modify the Program, your modified version must
prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely..." doesn't app
You could always release it under Mozilla Public License 2.0 and that
explicitely requires people to offer source code.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Nicolás Alvarez
wrote:
> 2017-10-17 13:27 GMT-03:00 Safwat Halaby :
> > I understand that GPLv3 has a loophole in which someone could modify
>
2017-10-17 13:27 GMT-03:00 Safwat Halaby :
> I understand that GPLv3 has a loophole in which someone could modify
> your GPL-licensed code, and then run it on a server which offers some
> service. Since a service is being sent over the wire, and not the
> executable itself, then they can keep their
I understand that GPLv3 has a loophole in which someone could modify
your GPL-licensed code, and then run it on a server which offers some
service. Since a service is being sent over the wire, and not the
executable itself, then they can keep their modified code private. AGPL
prevents this loophole
5 matches
Mail list logo
