Pieren schrieb:
> So, I would thank the approx. 300 who participated to the 'crappy poll'.
Agree, and thanks to you for organizing it!
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
At 10:29 09/12/2009, Pieren wrote:
...
>But the OSMF never tries to reach those who are not reading the
>talk-lists or watching the forums. How many times have we seen a call
>for a simple question about the new license on the diary or on the
>main site page or on the header on all wiki pages ? Nev
On 09/12/2009, at 7:29 PM, Pieren wrote:
> The poll contains the three original questions which will be asked to
> all contributors if the new license is approved by the OSMF:
> - yes
> - yes and consider all my data PD
> - no
> Then I added two more questions for those who would say 'no', for this
John Smith wrote:
>
> 2009/12/9 Pieren :
> > - yes and consider all my data PD
>
> Umm what happens in jurisdictions where PD isnt' applicable?
This answer means just plain "Yes" for the ODbL. My understanding is
that the PD part would be just a manifest, not dangerous at all.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Pieren schrieb:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Rahkonen Jukka > It would be only
> confusing to have
>> more options like in the opinion poll at
>> http://doodle.com/feqszqirqqxi4r7w
>>
>
> The poll contains the three original questions which will be asked to
> all contributors if the new licen
2009/12/9 Pieren :
> - yes and consider all my data PD
Umm what happens in jurisdictions where PD isnt' applicable?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Pieren wrote:
> So, I would thank the approx. 300 who participated to the 'crappy poll'.
Pilot survey, I'd call it.
So would I, because it showed clearly that more than one question should be
asked.
___
talk mailing list
talk@opens
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Rahkonen Jukka > It would be only
confusing to have
> more options like in the opinion poll at
> http://doodle.com/feqszqirqqxi4r7w
>
The poll contains the three original questions which will be asked to
all contributors if the new license is approved by the OSMF:
-
Somehow I feel that in the final voting OSM contributors will have two
choices: Yes or No. Reason is merely rational. When you vote in
precidential election you are not asked WHY do you want to give your
vote for your candidate. It is the same with the election about the new
licence, it does not ma
9 matches
Mail list logo