Re: [OSM-talk] Question that will not be asked

2009-12-09 Thread Ulf Möller
Pieren schrieb: > So, I would thank the approx. 300 who participated to the 'crappy poll'. Agree, and thanks to you for organizing it! ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Question that will not be asked

2009-12-09 Thread Michael Collinson
At 10:29 09/12/2009, Pieren wrote: ... >But the OSMF never tries to reach those who are not reading the >talk-lists or watching the forums. How many times have we seen a call >for a simple question about the new license on the diary or on the >main site page or on the header on all wiki pages ? Nev

Re: [OSM-talk] Question that will not be asked

2009-12-09 Thread James Livingston
On 09/12/2009, at 7:29 PM, Pieren wrote: > The poll contains the three original questions which will be asked to > all contributors if the new license is approved by the OSMF: > - yes > - yes and consider all my data PD > - no > Then I added two more questions for those who would say 'no', for this

Re: [OSM-talk] Question that will not be asked

2009-12-09 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
John Smith wrote: > > 2009/12/9 Pieren : > > - yes and consider all my data PD > > Umm what happens in jurisdictions where PD isnt' applicable? This answer means just plain "Yes" for the ODbL. My understanding is that the PD part would be just a manifest, not dangerous at all. -Jukka Rahkonen-

Re: [OSM-talk] Question that will not be asked

2009-12-09 Thread Ulf Lamping
Pieren schrieb: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Rahkonen Jukka > It would be only > confusing to have >> more options like in the opinion poll at >> http://doodle.com/feqszqirqqxi4r7w >> > > The poll contains the three original questions which will be asked to > all contributors if the new licen

Re: [OSM-talk] Question that will not be asked

2009-12-09 Thread John Smith
2009/12/9 Pieren : > - yes and consider all my data PD Umm what happens in jurisdictions where PD isnt' applicable? ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Question that will not be asked

2009-12-09 Thread Liz
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Pieren wrote: > So, I would thank the approx. 300 who participated to the 'crappy poll'. Pilot survey, I'd call it. So would I, because it showed clearly that more than one question should be asked. ___ talk mailing list talk@opens

Re: [OSM-talk] Question that will not be asked

2009-12-09 Thread Pieren
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Rahkonen Jukka > It would be only confusing to have > more options like in the opinion poll at > http://doodle.com/feqszqirqqxi4r7w > The poll contains the three original questions which will be asked to all contributors if the new license is approved by the OSMF: -

[OSM-talk] Question that will not be asked

2009-12-09 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Somehow I feel that in the final voting OSM contributors will have two choices: Yes or No. Reason is merely rational. When you vote in precidential election you are not asked WHY do you want to give your vote for your candidate. It is the same with the election about the new licence, it does not ma