Andy Townsend writes:
> If there's something new to add I, as an OSM list-reading punter*, would
> be glad to read it (perhaps on the tagging list if that's what it's
> about) but frankly it's all getting a bit repetitive.
This time around it's: who do we encourage to contribute to OSM?
Frederik Ramm writes:
> But what if I have said the same thing five times already and the others
> STILL don't see that I'm RIGHT
Nobody has told me how I can create a relation which hops between OSM
and OHM. Nobody has told me how I can have a node keep the same
location in both OSM and
May I respectfully suggest that before anyone sends yet another reply to
this thread that they ask "Has this point of view been put forward
already?". Everyone is well aware that there is disagreement (and
sometimes even disagreement over what to disagree over), but people are
rarely won over
I'm loving the irony of Andy's criticism of people repeating themselves
by repeating himself not once, or twice, but three times. In the same
message.
(& no, I don't believe it was done intentionally for comic effect).
Dave F. (bored of people in OSM thinking they're somehow superior to
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> But what if I have said the same thing five times already and the
> others STILL don't see that I'm RIGHT
Please try not to bring OSMF board meeting conventions onto the talk list.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
On 09/08/2015 03:12 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
> * written entirely in the personal capacity of someone who is fed up of
> reading the same mailing list posts by several people repeating
> different sides of the same argument ad nauseam.
But what if I have said the same thing five times
6 matches
Mail list logo
