Re: [OSM-talk] Relation history times out

2010-10-04 Thread Dave F.
On 04/10/2010 14:18, Gregory Williams wrote: You could just query the last few revisions manually, like this: http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/152791/77 Ah! through the api. i was trying similar, but through /browser/ Thanks Gregory Cheers Dave F.

Re: [OSM-talk] Relation history times out

2010-10-04 Thread Gregory Williams
Talk Subject: [OSM-talk] Relation history times out Hi I've a relation whose history I want to view. It's failing on this error: Sorry, the data for the relation with the id 152791, took too long to retrieve. Presumably because we're up to version 78. Is there a way to overcome

[OSM-talk] Relation history times out

2010-10-04 Thread Dave F.
Hi I've a relation whose history I want to view. It's failing on this error: Sorry, the data for the relation with the id 152791, took too long to retrieve. Presumably because we're up to version 78. Is there a way to overcome this, say to just view the last few revisions? Cheers Dave F.

Re: [OSM-talk] Relation history times out

2010-10-04 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Dave F. wrote: Presumably because we're up to version 78. Probably on a very big relation also. If this happens, I often delete the relation and re-upload it under a new id (adding a note tag explaining what I did) so that the beast becomes more manageable. Of course if you can split

[OSM-talk] Relation history

2008-02-22 Thread Ben Laenen
Can someone tell me if this is the correct url to get the complete history of a relation from the OSM API: http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/relation/5286/history since it only returns Application errors to me. Thanks, Ben ___ talk mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] Relation history

2008-02-22 Thread Dave Stubbs
it's the right URL, but: http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/557 patches welcome I'm guessing. On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can someone tell me if this is the correct url to get the complete history of a relation from the OSM API: