[OSM-talk] Relations Proposals for boundary, country and is_in

Hi, I've founde three relation proposals with nearly the seam aims. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Boundaries http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Country http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Is_In I've also seen relations w

Re: [OSM-talk] Relations Proposals for boundary, country and is_in

"Raphael Studer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've founde three relation proposals with nearly the seam aims. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Boundaries > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Country > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Rel

Re: [OSM-talk] Relations Proposals for boundary, country and is_in

Hi, > Btw: is there a clear procedure on how we make relation usages > standard? I believe the route relation has become standard by being used, and I'd suggest the same for others ;-) Bye Frederik ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http:/

Re: [OSM-talk] Relations Proposals for boundary, country and is_in

Knut Arne Bjørndal wrote: > "Raphael Studer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I've founde three relation proposals with nearly the seam aims. >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Boundaries >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Country >> http://wik