Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering idiosyncrasies

2015-11-02 Thread Marc Gemis
So you know a bigger landuse area that gets rendered on top of a smaller one thanks to the layer tag ? I got this information (not using the layer tag for landuse ordering) from Matthijs Melissen. regards m On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:31 A

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering idiosyncrasies

2015-11-02 Thread Clifford Snow
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: > I was once told by one of the style developers that the layer tag is not > used in the standard rendering on osm.org. Only the size of the area's > matter. > I can confirm that using a layer tag does impact rendering of landuse. -- @osm_sea

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering idiosyncrasies

2015-11-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-11-02 20:31 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis : > I was once told by one of the style developers that the layer tag is not > used in the standard rendering on osm.org. Only the size of the area's > matter. > it is used, but not always (e.g. roads are always above buildings, regardless the layer these ar

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering idiosyncrasies

2015-11-02 Thread Marc Gemis
I was once told by one of the style developers that the layer tag is not used in the standard rendering on osm.org. Only the size of the area's matter. regards m On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Ed Loach wrote: > Dave asked: > > > > Is anybody able to explain why the wood on the left renders >

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering idiosyncrasies

2015-11-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-11-02 20:20 GMT+01:00 Dave F. : > Never knew wood recognised the layer tag. Is this a recent development or > has the wood's icon layer made it obvious? > > As I'm unfamiliar with this language & the non existent formatting make it > illegible could you tell me if this applies to all areas? >

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering idiosyncrasies

2015-11-02 Thread Dave F.
Well, I've learnt something new today. Never knew wood recognised the layer tag. Is this a recent development or has the wood's icon layer made it obvious? As I'm unfamiliar with this language & the non existent formatting make it illegible could you tell me if this applies to all areas? Unf

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering idiosyncrasies

2015-11-02 Thread Ed Loach
Dave asked: > > > Is anybody able to explain why the wood on the left renders > > > above the school, yet the one to the right, under? Martin replied: > > because areas are sorted by size, bigger is rendered first. Dave commented: > I genuinely can't work out if that's said as a joke. Take for e

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering idiosyncrasies

2015-11-02 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Monday 02 November 2015, Dave F. wrote: > I genuinely can't work out if that's said as a joke. It is not, landcover polygon rendering is sorted by size in the standard style. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ ___ talk mailing list talk@o

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering idiosyncrasies

2015-11-02 Thread Dave F.
I genuinely can't work out if that's said as a joke. On 02/11/2015 17:20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone Am 02.11.2015 um 17:21 schrieb Dave F. : Is anybody able to explain why the wood on the left renders above the school, yet the one to the right, under? because areas ar

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering idiosyncrasies

2015-11-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 02.11.2015 um 17:21 schrieb Dave F. : > > Is anybody able to explain why the wood on the left renders above the school, > yet the one to the right, under? because areas are sorted by size, bigger is rendered first. cheers, Martin _

[OSM-talk] Rendering idiosyncrasies

2015-11-02 Thread Dave F.
Hi http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.36615/-2.34169 Is anybody able to explain why the wood on the left renders above the school, yet the one to the right, under? Dave F. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus